2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)07202-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association studies of genetic polymorphisms and complex disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
103
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other possibilities include genuine locus or allele heterogeneity among different populations and differences in risk-allele frequencies among studies (46)(47)(48). Substantial differences in IL1RN VNTR frequencies have been reported among different ethnic groups (9,10,25,41,49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other possibilities include genuine locus or allele heterogeneity among different populations and differences in risk-allele frequencies among studies (46)(47)(48). Substantial differences in IL1RN VNTR frequencies have been reported among different ethnic groups (9,10,25,41,49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among patients with no history of previous myocardial infarction, there were significantly greater numbers of patients with determined genotypes compared with the numbers of patients with myocardial infarction, thus suggesting a protective action for patients with such genotypes. These types of studies must be interpreted with criticism, because they are subject to a potentially high risk of bias, as discussed in the review by Gambaro et al 27 However, this example is of particular interest, because the individuals identified who were protected against ischemic disease were asymptomatic and had no history of myocardial infarction, although they were at high risk for developing it-documented coronary atherosclerosis-and were not just normal, healthy individuals (although the study included a control group of healthy participants). Thus, there was a greater opportunity to find true protective factors rather than simply the absence of disease, which would be expected in a group of healthy individuals with a normal population risk.…”
Section: Studies In Individuals Potentially Protected From Developingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Finally, some histocompatibility antigen alleles have been linked in case-control studies with a decreased susceptibility to lung carcinoma, 48 melanoma, 49 and renal cell carcinoma, 50 and even homozygotic women for determined polymorphic alleles of the BRCA-1 gene have been associated with a decreased risk of breast carcinoma. 51 The ambiguous and clinically not very relevant results of some of these studies may be explained by flaws in methodology, as detailed elsewhere, 27 but also may be related in part to an inadequate selection of the study populations. Compared with the former studies, in which individuals were selected by a very characteristic phenotype-a definite protection against developing HIV or myocardial infarction-the latter studies compared the risk of patients who have developed disease with a control group formed by normal control participants.…”
Section: Studies In Individuals Potentially Protected From Developingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, results are published that do not later replicate in other studies. 14,19,23,32,82,91 There are multiple factors that render it difficult for these studies to produce reliable results, such as the high rate of false positives due to multiple testing, 73 population structure, 64 and the presence of confounding factors or limitations in the clinical data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%