2018
DOI: 10.15361/1984-5529.2018v46n1p38-41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between agronomic and bread-making quality traits in wheat: location and crop-year effects

Abstract: The present study aimed to evaluate the associations between agronomic and bread-making quality traits in wheat under different growing environments. Nineteen Brazilian wheat cultivars were evaluated at six locations (Cascavel-PR, Castro-PR, Guarapuava-PR, Palotina-PR, Abelardo Luz-SC, and Não-Me-Toque-RS) during five years (2007 to 2011). The direction and magnitude of the associations between agronomic and bread-making quality traits were strongly dependent on the test location and year of evaluation. This s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variability could be attributed to the particular pedoclimatic conditions of the study areas. Indeed, the effects of year and locality, as well as their interaction, play a preponderant role in defining the agronomic and qualitative characteristics of wheat [ 65 ]. The ratio between tenacity and extensibility of dough (P/L), also known as configuration ratio, is commonly used together with the deformation energy as a quality flour indicator [ 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability could be attributed to the particular pedoclimatic conditions of the study areas. Indeed, the effects of year and locality, as well as their interaction, play a preponderant role in defining the agronomic and qualitative characteristics of wheat [ 65 ]. The ratio between tenacity and extensibility of dough (P/L), also known as configuration ratio, is commonly used together with the deformation energy as a quality flour indicator [ 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%