“…Although the specificity of AMA for cardiac involvement was 92% in a recent meta-analysis 2 and the I 2 value for these analyses was >50%, it was concluded that, according to diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) analysis, the overall pooled accuracy was not high enough to draw definitive conclusions on the pathogenicity of AMA in IIM-related cardiomyopathy. 2 Whether AMAs were already present in the index patient at initial presentation for arrhythmias remains speculative, as they were not determined. It is also not mentioned whether the index patient has been tested for myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) or myositis auto-antibodies (MAAs) other than AMA, such as anti PL-7, anti-PL-12, SRP, TIF1-γ, anti-NXP2, anti-SAE, MDA5, ANA, HMGCR, or anti-Ro/SSA.…”