2023
DOI: 10.1071/wf23060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between Australian climate drivers and extreme weekly fire danger

Rachel Taylor,
Andrew G. Marshall,
Steven Crimp
et al.

Abstract: Aims We investigate the associations between major Australian climate drivers and extreme weekly fire danger throughout the year. Methods We use a composite-based approach, relating the probability of top-decile observed potential fire intensity to the positive and negative modes of the El Niño Southern Oscillation, Indian Ocean Dipole, Madden–Julian Oscillation, Southern Annular Mode, split-flow blocking and Subtropical Ridge Tasman Highs, both concurrently and at a variety of lag times. Key resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These reconstructions further demonstrate the potential for such linear techniques to be used as predictive tools in their own right in fire risk forecasting, or for the statistical relationships to be used to improve dynamical forecasting systems [38]. There are limits to the extent to which climatic processes can be described or explained in terms of linear relationships, as it is acknowledged [39][40][41] that many nonlinearities and asymmetries [19,20,42] exist in climate dynamics. Rainfall, in particular, is vulnerable in this respect, as large rainfall events often occur on small spatial and temporal scales (e.g., convective cell thunderstorms, cut-off lows) driven more by sub-synoptic processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These reconstructions further demonstrate the potential for such linear techniques to be used as predictive tools in their own right in fire risk forecasting, or for the statistical relationships to be used to improve dynamical forecasting systems [38]. There are limits to the extent to which climatic processes can be described or explained in terms of linear relationships, as it is acknowledged [39][40][41] that many nonlinearities and asymmetries [19,20,42] exist in climate dynamics. Rainfall, in particular, is vulnerable in this respect, as large rainfall events often occur on small spatial and temporal scales (e.g., convective cell thunderstorms, cut-off lows) driven more by sub-synoptic processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These, in turn, are influenced by large-scale climate drivers such as the El Niño Southern Oscillation, Indian Ocean Dipole, and Southern Annular Mode, among others [15]. These drivers have been shown to impact the extremes of temperature [16][17][18], fire weather, and fire risk [19,20]. As many of these drivers can be forecast in advance [21], knowledge of their states could be utilised in forecasting severe fire danger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of climate drivers (Table 1) is based upon the results of previous analyses showing their significant influences on Australian climate (e.g., [23][24][25][26][27]) and fire danger [16,28]. These are the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), Southern Annular Mode (SAM), Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), split-flow blocking and persistent modes of high pressure in the region of the Tasman Sea (STRH).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), Southern Annular Mode (SAM), Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO), split-flow blocking and persistent modes of high pressure in the region of the Tasman Sea (STRH). Following the methods used by Marshall et al [16] and Taylor et al [28], we use meteorological data from NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis 1 [29] to compute climate driver indices and define the high and low polarities when the driver is >1 SD above or below its 2003-2017 mean. For the observed and ACCESS-S2 simulated FBI, we stratify the dates in the datasets according to when the climate driver under investigation is in the phase of interest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%