Associations Between Calcaneal Enthesophytes and Osteoarthritis of the Hands and Feet

Menz, Hylton B.; Marshall, Michelle; Thomas, Martin J.; Rathod‐Mistry, Trishna; Roddy, Edward

doi:10.1002/acr.24030

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1). A total of 44 papers [9–52] were included ( n= 186,262,669). These epidemiological studies came from five continents and 17 different national regions (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Cai,

Song,

et al. 2023

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Though hallux valgus is a common foot deformity, the integrated information on its global prevalence and incidence is relatively lacking. The aim of this research was to assess the global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus, thus providing reliable data reference for clinical practice. Methods A systematic review of global hallux valgus research publications concerning its prevalence and incidence was performed based on six electronic databases ((PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Online Journals and CQVIP)) from their inception to November 16, 2022. The search terms included “hallux valgus or bunion and prevalence or incidence or epidemiology.” All languages were included. Data were extracted by country, continent, age group, gender and other information. The risk of bias was assessed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Instrument for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data by using random-effects models to synthesize available evidence. Results A total of 45 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimated prevalence was 19% (95% CI, 13% to 25%) (n=186,262,669) for hallux valgus. In subgroup meta-analyses, the prevalence of hallux valgus was 21.96% (95% CI, 10.95% to 35.46%) in Asia, 3% (95% CI, 0% to 15%) in Africa, 18.35% (95% CI, 11.65% to 26.16%) in Europe, 29.26% (95% CI, 4.8% to 63.26%) in Oceania, and 16.1% (95% CI, 5.9% to 30.05%) in North America, respectively. The pooled prevalence of hallux valgus by gender was 23.74% (95% CI, 16.21% to 32.21%) for females and 11.43% (95% CI, 6.18% to 18%) for males. The prevalence was 11% (95% CI, 2% to 26%) in individuals younger than 20 years old, 12.22% in adults aged 20-60 years (95% CI, 5.86% to 20.46%) and 22.7% in elderly people aged over 60 years (95% CI, 13.1% to 33.98%). Conclusion This research provided the global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus in terms of its spatial, temporal, and population distribution. The global estimated pooled prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus was 19%. A higher prevalence of hallux valgus was found in females, Oceania countries, and among people aged over 60 years. Due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies, the findings should be interpreted with caution.

show abstract

“…1). A total of 44 papers [9–52] were included ( n= 186,262,669). These epidemiological studies came from five continents and 17 different national regions (Table 1).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Cai,

Song,

et al. 2023

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Disease-specific definitions of new bone formation on spine radiographs: a systematic literature review

Gazel,

Ayan,

Hryciw

et al. 2024

Rheumatology Advances in Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives We aimed to explore the radiographic definitions of types of New Bone formation (NBF) by focusing on the terminology, description, and location of the findings. Methods Three systematic literature reviews were conducted in parallel to identify the radiographic spinal NBF definitions for spondyloarthritis (SpA), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), and osteoarthritis (OA). Study characteristics and definitions were extracted independently by two reviewers. Definitions were analyzed and collated based on whether they were unique, modified or established from previous research. Results We identified 33 studies that indicated a definition for the NBF in SpA, ten for DISH, and seven for spinal OA. In SpA, the variations in syndesmophytes included the description as well as the subtypes and locations. The differentiation of syndesmophytes from osteophytes were included in 12 articles, based on the origin and the angle of the NBF and associated findings. The definitions of DISH varied in the number of vertebrae, level, and laterality. For OA, five articles indicated that osteophytes arose from the anterior or lateral aspects of the vertebral bodies, and two studies required a size cut-off. Discussion Our ultimate aim is to create formal NBF definitions for SpA, DISH, and OA guided by an atlas, through a Delphi exercise with international experts. The improved ability to differentiate these conditions radiographically will not only allow the clinicians to accurately approach patients but also will help the researchers to better classify patient phenotypes and focus on accurate radiographic outcomes.

show abstract

Associations Between Calcaneal Enthesophytes and Osteoarthritis of the Hands and Feet

Cited by 2 publications

References 35 publications

Global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Disease-specific definitions of new bone formation on spine radiographs: a systematic literature review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About