2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between executive function impairment and biochemical abnormalities in depressed adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the self-injury cue, the P3 amplitude of NSSI group was larger than that of HC group, and the P3 amplitude with the self-injury cue was significantly larger than that with the neutral cue, indicating that the neural response of NSSI adolescents changed during exposure to the self-injury cue ( Zhou et al, 2022 ). Allen found difficulty in response inhibition in the group of eating disorders with NSSI ( Allen et al, 2020 ), Nilsson also found that compared with healthy people ( Nilsson et al, 2021 ), patients with intentional self-mutilation had defects in cognitive flexibility and response inhibition, and Zhang also found executive dysfunction in the group of MDD adolescents with NSSI ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Our study find neuroelectrophysiological evidence in the adolescent MDD with NSSI compared with HC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Under the self-injury cue, the P3 amplitude of NSSI group was larger than that of HC group, and the P3 amplitude with the self-injury cue was significantly larger than that with the neutral cue, indicating that the neural response of NSSI adolescents changed during exposure to the self-injury cue ( Zhou et al, 2022 ). Allen found difficulty in response inhibition in the group of eating disorders with NSSI ( Allen et al, 2020 ), Nilsson also found that compared with healthy people ( Nilsson et al, 2021 ), patients with intentional self-mutilation had defects in cognitive flexibility and response inhibition, and Zhang also found executive dysfunction in the group of MDD adolescents with NSSI ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Our study find neuroelectrophysiological evidence in the adolescent MDD with NSSI compared with HC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… 27 Neuroimaging studies have reported significant anterior cingulate cortex activation and reduced medial prefrontal cortex connectivity in adolescents with NSSI compared to healthy controls, 28 , 29 these brain region changes are crucial for the performance of executive function. However, the results of executive functioning in adolescent with NSSI engagement are inconsistent, some studies indicating little evidence of executive functioning differences between adolescents with NSSI and healthy controls; 30 while others demonstrating significant executive function deficits in NSSI groups, 31 , 32 and adolescents who currently NSSI exhibiting poor decision-making skills compared to those with a previous history of NSSI. 33 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that suicidal behavior usually begins with self-injury, a common behavior among young patients with depression, investigating the suicidal risk factors in people having MDD with self-injury behavior is critical. Based on the assessment of various behavioral abnormalities, such as executive dysfunction in adolescents with depression and NSSI [ 11 ] and patients having bipolar disorder with suicidal ideation [ 12 ] as well as impaired decision-making in those with SA [ 13 ], several statistical and actuarial scales have been developed to aid clinicians to predict and manage suicide risk [ 14 – 16 ]. Studies investigating biomarkers and neural markers of suicide risk [ 17 ] have suggested neural connectivity as a response predictor for psychotherapy in individuals with NSSI [ 18 ] as well as biologically-informed approaches [ 19 ], including low serum cholesterol level, as potential suicide risk biomarkers in patients with MDD and suicidal behavior [ 2 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%