2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5481-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between fasciolosis and milk production, and the impact of anthelmintic treatment in dairy herds

Abstract: Liver fluke is a ubiquitous parasite that causes extensive production losses in cattle and is a zoonosis. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of fasciolosis in 178 dairy cattle herds in Styria (federal state of Austria) and its influence on production, to detect the risk factors for infection, and to explore effective strategies in management and control. A questionnaire on farm management, prophylaxis, and therapy was developed and applied. Furthermore, production parameters (milk yield, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All tests detected changes in antibody levels 90 days post-treatment and Bio-X showed greater accuracy in this detection as all changes after treatment were significant. However, a larger sample population and/or longer sampling time would be necessary to confirm the findings using the Svanovir kit as observed by Köstenberger et al in 2017 [50] and Charlier et al in 2012 [49]. The use of all four tests with BTM samples showed to be a reliable tool for the determination of high and low exposure seasons and in-herd prevalence throughout the year, however, results must be interpreted considering herd health management, Fasciola hepatica life cycle and herd milking pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All tests detected changes in antibody levels 90 days post-treatment and Bio-X showed greater accuracy in this detection as all changes after treatment were significant. However, a larger sample population and/or longer sampling time would be necessary to confirm the findings using the Svanovir kit as observed by Köstenberger et al in 2017 [50] and Charlier et al in 2012 [49]. The use of all four tests with BTM samples showed to be a reliable tool for the determination of high and low exposure seasons and in-herd prevalence throughout the year, however, results must be interpreted considering herd health management, Fasciola hepatica life cycle and herd milking pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In general, the naturally infected-beef population presented decreases of ELISA values 90 days after the application of treatment. The Svanovir kit has previously shown a significant decrease of ODRs at 3–6 months [49] and 1 year [50] post treatment. These previous reports and the present results propose the use of the Svanovir kit more than 90 days after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, management of domestic animals (including range restrictions) can be a confounding factor for the estimation of the actual transmission risk between these hosts. By contrast, wild ruminants are free-ranging and may graze large geographic areas including domestic animals’ pastures where it is frequently observed ( 40 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the recent Swiss study [ 17 ], where most of herds were similarly small, herd size proved to increase the risk of exposure to O. ostertagi , which indicates that the role of herd size in the epidemiology of O. ostertagi is unclear and any conclusion should be drawn very cautiously. Contrary to some previous studies [ 11 , 17 ] we did not include milk yield in our risk analysis as reduced milk yield is a consequence of more intensive exposure to the parasites [ 2 , 37 , 45 ] rather than a factor affecting the exposure. The only thing not mentioned before is the fact that using hay or haylage as main roughage increases risk of exposure to F. hepatica , when compared to corn silage, even when no pasture or fresh grass is available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%