2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.693818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between Intellectual and Social Activities With Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in China: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Background: Frailty is one of the most important global health challenges. We aimed to examine the associations between frequency of intellectual and social activities and frailty among community-dwelling older adults in China.Methods: This is a prospective analysis of older adults (aged ≥60 years) who had intellectual and social activity data and were free of frailty from the national representative China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The exposure was frequency of intellectual and social … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By accumulating multi-dimensional age-related de cits and then dividing by the total number of them, FI is generated as a continuous indicator ranging from 0 to 1, with higher representing higher levels of frailty (Rockwood & Mitnitski 2007). Many studies have successfully drawn results using frailty measured at a single point in time (Huang et al 2021;Wang et al 2020; Wang et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By accumulating multi-dimensional age-related de cits and then dividing by the total number of them, FI is generated as a continuous indicator ranging from 0 to 1, with higher representing higher levels of frailty (Rockwood & Mitnitski 2007). Many studies have successfully drawn results using frailty measured at a single point in time (Huang et al 2021;Wang et al 2020; Wang et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study followed previous studies [17,18] and chose the Frailty Index (FI) scale to measure frailty in older people. This scale includes a total of 39 diseases or defects to construct a frailty index.…”
Section: Frailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frailty was measured with a frailty index (FI), constructed from 30 indicators, including thirteen healthrelated diagnoses from physicians, five on disabilities, and twelve on limitations with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (see Supplemental Table 1). The indicators were selected following recommended procedures [33] and scored consistent with previous studies [7,[34][35][36][37][38][39]. The sum of the individual indicator scores was divided by 30 to create the FI (range: 0-1).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%