2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38567
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between laterality of orofacial clefts and medical and academic outcomes

Abstract: Patients with oral clefts have an increased risk of other malformations, syndromes, and lower academic performance in school. Few studies have investigated if laterality of clefts is associated with medical and academic outcomes. Oral clefts have nonrandom laterality, with left-sided clefts occurring approximately twice as often as right-sided clefts. Using a retrospective study design, we examined potential associations of cleft attributes and outcomes in patients with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychiatric diagnoses varied across cleft subtypes and the affected side: the highest proportion of psychiatric diagnoses were observed in CLP, and bilateral-sided clefts. These observations may suggest that the more complicated clefts more likely present with psychiatric comorbidities (Pedersen et al, 2016;Gallagher et al, 2018). We did not observe psychiatric comorbidities in CPO children, which is in contrast with previous observations (Nilsson et al, 2015;Pedersen et al, 2016;Tillman et al, 2018;Gallagher and Collett, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Psychiatric diagnoses varied across cleft subtypes and the affected side: the highest proportion of psychiatric diagnoses were observed in CLP, and bilateral-sided clefts. These observations may suggest that the more complicated clefts more likely present with psychiatric comorbidities (Pedersen et al, 2016;Gallagher et al, 2018). We did not observe psychiatric comorbidities in CPO children, which is in contrast with previous observations (Nilsson et al, 2015;Pedersen et al, 2016;Tillman et al, 2018;Gallagher and Collett, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is also consistent with US data, revealing that left-sided clefts were 2 times as likely as right-sided clefts (Genisca et al, 2009). Interestingly, the laterality of cleft has some clinical significance in that right-sided cleft appears to be uniquely associated with other types of malformations and intellectual disability, suggesting a distinct etiology from either the left-sided or both-sided clefts (Gallagher et al, 2018). Our data show that whatever factor or multitude of factors that are responsible for causing clefts to be on one side or the other are well conserved throughout geographic regions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hypothesized mechanisms include functional consequences of oral clefting (eg, feeding difficulty, eustachian tube dysfunction, or speech impairment), treatment factors (eg, frequent school absences 7 ), repeated anesthesia exposures [8][9][10][11] ), and social stigma (eg, differential treatment based on appearance or speech and/or voice quality). Researchers also suggest that patients with OFCs may have structural brain differences [12][13][14] and differences in outcome depending on cleft laterality, 15,16 implying that a cleft might be a marker for aberrant brain development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%