2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between Mutations in MSH6 and PMS2 and Risk of Surveillance-detected Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that MLH1 and MSH2 carriers have higher odds of CRC development during surveillance than MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM carriers and patients with a mixed genotype. In accordance with these results, other studies have found that MLH1 and MSH2 carriers have a higher risk of developing CRC than MLH6 carriers ( 25 ), as well as PMS2 carriers ( 14 16 ), which could also be explained by the more rapid CRC development amongst MLH1 and MSH2 carriers ( 6 ). This finding could be used to bring forward a more individualized approach towards LS surveillance in which genotype is taken into consideration when an appropriate surveillance interval is recommended, which has previously been proposed by Goverde et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that MLH1 and MSH2 carriers have higher odds of CRC development during surveillance than MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM carriers and patients with a mixed genotype. In accordance with these results, other studies have found that MLH1 and MSH2 carriers have a higher risk of developing CRC than MLH6 carriers ( 25 ), as well as PMS2 carriers ( 14 16 ), which could also be explained by the more rapid CRC development amongst MLH1 and MSH2 carriers ( 6 ). This finding could be used to bring forward a more individualized approach towards LS surveillance in which genotype is taken into consideration when an appropriate surveillance interval is recommended, which has previously been proposed by Goverde et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…For instance, some studies suggest that MLH1 carriers are at a higher risk of developing CRC than PMS2 carriers ( 13 15 ). Meanwhile, MLH1 and MSH2 carriers are estimated to have a similar risk for CRC, and MSH6 carriers present an intermediate risk in the genetic spectrum ( 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, rare mutations in EPCAM causes loss of MSH2 and also causes Lynch syndrome. [28][29][30][31] Results of genetic testing subsequently guides family germline testing as well as guides risk stratification and personalized screening.…”
Section: Germline Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10 .3390/cancers13092081/s1, Table S1: Studies evaluating cumulative CRC risk in Lynch syndrome in relation to germline mutations in MMR gene; Table S2: Studies evaluating somatic mutations in sporadic CRC. References [49][50][51][52]58,59,63,68,69,74] are cited in the Supplementary Material. Funding: This research was funded by the AIRC Foundation for Cancer Research (Grant number: IG 21723 to L.R.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent findings have shown distinct associations between MMR mutations and cancer risks [ 49 , 50 ] ( Supplementary Table S1 ). A prospective study demonstrated that carriers of MSH2 mutations show the highest risk of developing adenomas and advanced adenomas, probably as a consequence of the association between germline MSH2 alterations and somatic APC gene mutations which may contribute to accelerate the colonic malignant transformation [ 49 ].…”
Section: Hereditary Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%