Associations between occupational and social interaction factors and well-being among people with psychiatric disabilities living in supported housing in Sweden

Abstract

Research indicates that occupation is important for well-being in people with mental illness, but this has not been extensively studied among those with severe psychiatric disabilities. Social contacts may possibly play a more vital role for them. This study aimed to explore how aspects of occupation and social interaction were related with well-being factors in that group, while controlling for the influence of clinical factors. People with psychiatric disabilities living in congregate supported housing (CSH; N = 155) responded to questionnaires addressing occupation, social contacts and well-being aspects, such as subjective health, quality of life, self-mastery, and personal recovery. A comparison group with psychiatric disabilities who lived in an ordinary flat or house and received outreach housing support (N = 111) completed the same instruments. The two groups were compared regarding their pattern of associations between occupation, social contacts, and well-being. Associations between occupation and well-being in the CSH group showed that general satisfaction with everyday occupations in particular was related to all aspects of well-being, whereas activity level and occupational balance were not related to well-being. The relationships were fewer and weaker, in comparison to the group in ordinary housing with outreach support. Indicators of social contacts were basically unrelated to well-being. The study contributes to occupational science by showing that the role of a high activity level for well-being, although important, should not be overemphasized. Future research should focus on narratives to get the voices of people residing in CSH and on exploration of how individually/socially performed occupations are associated with well-being.

Have People Over 64 Used Technological Devices During COVID-19?

“…Klund (2020) found that individual social participation is closely related to the recovery process [9]. Social interaction is a very influential factor in the individual.…”

The level of formal support received by people with severe mental illness living in supported accommodation and participation: A systematic review

“…Daily living functioning. Daily living function was identified in four of the studies (Eklund & Tjörnstrand, 2019;Fossey et al, 2006;Kruzich & Berg, 1985;Nelson et al, 1997) and compared between AMS and AHS. The direction of inference across all but one study (Eklund & Tjörnstrand, 2019) suggests that people with SMI living in AMS participate in more daily living activities than those in AHS.…”

Supported Employment, Participation at Work, and Peer Support: A Qualitative, Participatory Case Study Report of the Geesthacht Model

“…The value of work, activities and/ or employment for the recovery of people with mental health crises and psychosocial disabilities has been demonstrated in various contributions and reviews (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Work is a means for social integration and participation (23)(24)(25), it may have empowering effects (22,26), and may contribute to developing a sense in one's existence (26,27). Thus, enabling people to retain or gain work, activities and/ or employment has profound effects on many areas of life.…”