2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-122067/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between occupational therapy students’ academic performance and their study approaches and perceptions of the learning environment

Abstract: Background: Relationships between students’ academic performance and their employed study approaches have been studied extensively. However, research using study approaches and learning environment factors as concurrent predictors of academic performance is sparse. There is a need to disentangle the potentially interrelated influences of individual and contextual factors on students’ academic performance. Objective: This study aimed to increase the understanding of the associations between occupational therapy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This longitudinal observational study is part of a larger inquiry regarding the perceived learning environment (Thordardottir et al , 2020; Thygesen et al , 2020), approaches to studying (DaLomba et al , 2020; Gramstad et al , 2020; Mørk et al , 2020; Thørrisen et al , 2020) and academic performance (Bonsaksen et al , 2021) among occupational therapy students in Norway. The study employed data from the students in their first, second and third year of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This longitudinal observational study is part of a larger inquiry regarding the perceived learning environment (Thordardottir et al , 2020; Thygesen et al , 2020), approaches to studying (DaLomba et al , 2020; Gramstad et al , 2020; Mørk et al , 2020; Thørrisen et al , 2020) and academic performance (Bonsaksen et al , 2021) among occupational therapy students in Norway. The study employed data from the students in their first, second and third year of study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%