2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between self-rated health and the assessments of anchoring vignettes in cardiovascular patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is necessary to accelerate and increase the detection of suspected tuberculosis cases independently in the community, based on self-assessment. Self-assessment is an independent assessment that is very useful for increasing the number of people who feel at risk so they can assess their own condition and carry out a medical examination (8). Therefore, this study aimed to create a new paradigm to screen new cases of tuberculosis using a self-assessment website-based application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to accelerate and increase the detection of suspected tuberculosis cases independently in the community, based on self-assessment. Self-assessment is an independent assessment that is very useful for increasing the number of people who feel at risk so they can assess their own condition and carry out a medical examination (8). Therefore, this study aimed to create a new paradigm to screen new cases of tuberculosis using a self-assessment website-based application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, vignettes are based on a literature review/scoping or consultation with (health) professionals. Recent reviews have reported controversial conclusions regarding the impact of vignettes on utility estimates [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even individuals with the same ability or achievement level may evaluate the items differently depending on their past and give different responses at different times. Therefore, making comparisons between variables such as achievement and attitude without considering the differences between participants/countries may cause biased interpretations (Azzolina et al, 2017;Cope et al, 2016;Grol-Prokopczyk, et al, 2011;Hinz, 2017;Hinz et al, 2020;Murray & Chen, 1992;Salomon et al, 2004;, and the correlation between the variables of interest may give a different result than expected (Hinz et al, 2016;Hinz et al, 2020;Mottus et al, 2012). Consequently, different researchers cannot obtain consistent results for the variables (Hu et al, 2019), and the problem of validity arises in cross-country studies (Avvisati et al, 2019;Cope et al, 2016;Hu, 2018;Mottus et al, 2012;Primi et al2016;Rice et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this format, short stories called anchoring vignettes, in which hypothetical individuals/situations are defined were given to the participants, and they were asked to evaluate these individuals/situations. The objective is to reveal the differences between participants or countries after the process (He et al, 2017b;Hinz et al, 2020;Hirve et al, 2013;Hu et al, 2019;Korfage et al, 2007;Primi et al, 2016;Van Soest et al, 2011;Vonkova et al, 2018;Vonkova & Hrabak, 2015;Weiss & Roberts, 2018). The responses of participants/groups to the questionnaire or scales are called self-assessments; the responses of the original question are then rescaled according to the responses given to the anchoring vignettes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%