2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between UCP1 -3826A/G, UCP2 -866G/A, Ala55Val and Ins/Del, and UCP3 -55C/T Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundSome studies have reported associations between five uncoupling protein (UCP) 1–3 polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, other studies have failed to confirm the associations. This paper describes a case-control study and a meta-analysis conducted to attempt to determine whether the following polymorphisms are associated with T2DM: -3826A/G (UCP1); -866G/A, Ala55Val and Ins/Del (UCP2) and -55C/T (UCP3).MethodsThe case-control study enrolled 981 T2DM patients and 534 nondiabetic s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(125 reference statements)
4
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These polymorphisms have been shown to be associated with various metabolic traits such as obesity (24), body fat distribution (25), resting energy expenditure (26), type 2 diabetes (10) and insulin resistance (9,27) in various populations from different ethnic backgrounds (24). However, there were also studies that failed to show an association between these polymorphisms and metabolic traits (8,28,29). These inconsistencies could be attributed to the small sample size, incomplete coverage of the UCP2 gene variations or potential population-specific influences on metabolic traits (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These polymorphisms have been shown to be associated with various metabolic traits such as obesity (24), body fat distribution (25), resting energy expenditure (26), type 2 diabetes (10) and insulin resistance (9,27) in various populations from different ethnic backgrounds (24). However, there were also studies that failed to show an association between these polymorphisms and metabolic traits (8,28,29). These inconsistencies could be attributed to the small sample size, incomplete coverage of the UCP2 gene variations or potential population-specific influences on metabolic traits (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were also studies that failed to show an association between these polymorphisms and metabolic traits (8,28,29). These inconsistencies could be attributed to the small sample size, incomplete coverage of the UCP2 gene variations or potential population-specific influences on metabolic traits (29). Hence, in our study we have performed a meta-analysis of data from three large European cohorts (n up to 20 242) and used the tagSNP approach to capture all common genetic variations within the UCP2 gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles were excluded from the analysis if the genotype frequencies in the control group deviated from those predicted by the HWE and if they did not have enough data to estimate an OR with 95% CI. If data were duplicated and had been published more than once, the most complete study was chosen [25,26,33,34].…”
Section: Study Selection and Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other inheritance models were not analyzed due to the rarity of the minor alleles. Heterogeneity was tested using χ²-based Cochran's Q statistic and inconsistency was assessed with the I² metric, as previously described [25,26,33,34]. Briefly, heterogeneity was considered statistically significant at P <0.10 for the Q statistic and I²>50% for the I² metric statistics.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis For Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for the pooled effect; where heterogeneity was not significant, the fixed effect model (FEM) was used for this evaluation [37]. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses were performed to identify important studies with a significant impact on inter-study heterogeneity [25,26,33,34]. The factors investigated by meta-regression were age, BMI and gender.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis For Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%