2020
DOI: 10.1177/2513850219888031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between young children’s 
print fixations during book reading and 
their early literacy skills

Abstract: In the current study, the potentially causal association between young children’s fixations on print and their early literacy ability was explored. The primary purpose was to determine the potentially reciprocal relations between print fixations and literacy abilities, such that print fixations and early literacy skills reciprocally enhance one another rather than one having a direct effect on the other (e.g., fixation on print leads to improvement in early literacy skills). Visual fixations on print for 95 Ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To present accurate content validation, an analysis of scientific literature was carried out that reflects the actuality of research that has addressed the problem of this study from the start, with a focus on collecting data from various instruments for early childhood literacy (Bergman et al, 2021;Konishi et al, 2018;Korat et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2020;Lonigan et al, 2017;Markussen-Brown et al, 2017;Sampa et al, 2018;Scull et al, 2021;Wackerle-Hollman et al, 2020;Wirth et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2017) and various instruments for numeracy (Hellstrand et al, 2020;Korat et al, 2017;LeFevre et al, 2018;McLeod et al, 2019;Niklas and Tayler, 2018;Purpura and Lonigan, 2013;Raghubar and Barnes, 2017;Thomas et al, 2023;Wästerlid, 2022;Yang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To present accurate content validation, an analysis of scientific literature was carried out that reflects the actuality of research that has addressed the problem of this study from the start, with a focus on collecting data from various instruments for early childhood literacy (Bergman et al, 2021;Konishi et al, 2018;Korat et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2020;Lonigan et al, 2017;Markussen-Brown et al, 2017;Sampa et al, 2018;Scull et al, 2021;Wackerle-Hollman et al, 2020;Wirth et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2017) and various instruments for numeracy (Hellstrand et al, 2020;Korat et al, 2017;LeFevre et al, 2018;McLeod et al, 2019;Niklas and Tayler, 2018;Purpura and Lonigan, 2013;Raghubar and Barnes, 2017;Thomas et al, 2023;Wästerlid, 2022;Yang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used EFA to examine the factors underlying different task structures based on theoretical considerations. For literacy, the instrument was designed to test a twofactor model (expressive and receptive skills), but the analysis revealed three factors: expressive skills (Bergman et al, 2021;Konishi et al, 2018;Sampa et al, 2018), receptive skills (Liu et al, 2020;Markussen-Brown et al, 2017), and pre-reading skills such as letter knowledge, narrative skills, print awareness, and phonological awareness (Pan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%