2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11368-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of changes in neighbourhood walkability with changes in walking activity in older adults: a fixed effects analysis

Abstract: Background Supporting older adults to engage in physically active lifestyles requires supporting environments. Walkable environments may increase walking activity in older adults, but evidence for this subgroup is scarce, and longitudinal studies are lacking. This study therefore examined whether changes in neighbourhood walkability were associated with changes in walking activity in older adults, and whether this association differed by individual-level characteristics and by contextual condit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our objective-measure of walkability, estimated change in walkability exposure resulting from neighborhood relocation, inclusion of measures of walking for different purposes, statistical adjustment for baseline walking and walkability, inclusion of a control group (“non-movers”), and our two-staged modeling strategy that balanced the observed covariates between the groups prior to treatment effect estimation strengthened internal validity. Non-movers were observed to have a relatively small change in walkability between the baseline and follow-up suggesting that the neighborhood built environment remained relatively stable during the short term ( 70 , 71 ). Moreover, this temporal stability was also supported by our estimated intra-class correlation for the neighborhood walkability score for years 2008–2015 (ICC = 0.974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our objective-measure of walkability, estimated change in walkability exposure resulting from neighborhood relocation, inclusion of measures of walking for different purposes, statistical adjustment for baseline walking and walkability, inclusion of a control group (“non-movers”), and our two-staged modeling strategy that balanced the observed covariates between the groups prior to treatment effect estimation strengthened internal validity. Non-movers were observed to have a relatively small change in walkability between the baseline and follow-up suggesting that the neighborhood built environment remained relatively stable during the short term ( 70 , 71 ). Moreover, this temporal stability was also supported by our estimated intra-class correlation for the neighborhood walkability score for years 2008–2015 (ICC = 0.974).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all of the components included in this study were available for 2016; therefore, an earlier or later data set was sometimes used. Whereas some components such as the food environment have a relatively high temporal variability [ 34 ], others, including walkability, are relatively stable over time [ 45 ]. Moreover, the index suffers from limitations inherent in the index‐making process: subjective choices are made in the processes of data selection, cleaning, weighting, and aggregation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dit verhoogt de plausibiliteit dat het hier een (in ieder geval deels) oorzakelijk verband betreft. Echter, in een longitudinaal onderzoek vonden Timmermans et al (2021) dat veranderingen in de walkability-score van de woonomgeving van ouderen (die niet verhuisd waren) niet gerelateerd waren aan veranderingen in de hoeveelheid wandeltijd. Deze uitkomst ondersteunt een causale interpretatie juist niet.…”
Section: Walkability Van De Woonomgevingunclassified