Associations of Early-Life Threat and Deprivation With Executive Functioning in Childhood and Adolescence

Abstract

IMPORTANCEMany studies have demonstrated an association between early-life adversity (ELA) and executive functioning in children and adolescents. However, the aggregate magnitude of this association is unknown in the context of threat and deprivation types of adversity and various executive functioning domains.OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that experiences of deprivation are more strongly associated with reduced executive functioning compared with experiences of threat during childhood and adolescence.DATA SOURCES Embase, ERIC, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2020. Both forward and reverse snowball citation searches were performed to identify additional articles.STUDY SELECTION Articles were selected for inclusion if they (1) had a child and/or adolescent sample, (2) included measures of ELA, (3) measured executive functioning, (4) evaluated the association between adversity and executive functioning, (5) were published in a peer-reviewed journal, and (6) were published in the English language. No temporal or geographic limits were set. A 2-reviewer, blinded screening process was conducted.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS PRISMA guidelines were used to guide data extraction and article diagnostics (for heterogeneity, small study bias, and p-hacking). Article quality was assessed, and data extraction was performed by multiple independent observers. A 3-level meta-analytic model with a restricted maximum likelihood method was used. Moderator analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPrimary outcomes included measures of the 3 domains of executive functioning: cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, and working memory.RESULTS A total of 91 articles were included, representing 82 unique cohorts and 31 188 unique individuals. Deprivation, compared with threat, was associated with significantly lower inhibitory control (F 1,90 = 5.69; P = .02) and working memory (F 1,54 = 5.78; P = .02). No significant difference was observed for cognitive flexibility (F 1,36 = 2.38; P = .12). The pooled effect size of the association of inhibitory control with deprivation was stronger (Hedges g = −0.43; 95% CI, −0.57 to −0.29) compared with threat (Hedges g = −0.27; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.08). The pooled effect size of the association of working memory with deprivation was stronger (Hedges g = −0.54; 95% CI, −0.75 to −0.33) compared with threat (Hedges g = −0.28; 95% CI, −0.51 to −0.05).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Experiences of both threat and deprivation in childhood and adolescence were associated with reduced executive functioning, but the association was stronger for exposure to deprivation. Efforts to address the consequences of ELA for development should consider the associations between specific dimensions of adversity and specific developmental outcomes.

Impact of dimensions of early adversity on adult health and functioning: A 2-decade, longitudinal study

“…These child adversity dimensions may yield distinct transdiagnostic markers of psychopathology, proximal to their theorized neurocognitive mechanism. For instance, early exposure to deprivation has been found to contribute specifically to the proximal outcome, poor cognitive functioning (Bos et al, 2009;Eigsti et al, 2011;Pollak et al, 2010;Sheridan et al, 2017;Tibu et al, 2016), when measured by results from neuropsychological testing, questionnaires of executive functioning, and neural functioning during cognitive control tasks (Johnson et al, 2021). Early exposure to threat has been found to contribute specifically to the proximal outcome, emotion regulation, when measured by attention to emotional faces and fMRI results from mood induction paradigms (Gold et al, 2016;McCrory et al, 2013;McLaughlin et al, 2015;Pollak & Tolley-Schell, 2003).…”

Adolescents amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective study of psychological functioning

“…Stress, related to the COVID-19 spread and social distancing, was found to be associated with loneliness and depression [ 7 , 9 , 10 ]. Recent studies showed a high level of depression and anxiety in adolescents in different pandemic periods [ 9 , 11 – 15 ]. The COVID-19 diagnosis or close contact with an infected person, low social support, and negative coping has been found to relate to higher levels of depression and anxiety [ 14 , 16 ].…”

A Genetic Neural Net Model for the Relationship between Pre-School and Attention in Early Childhood

“…The spatial attention (SA) mechanism is a soft attention mechanism approach, which is designed to use a mask formation mechanism to compute a weight mask that identifies important features and allows the convolutional neural network to efficiently learn the region of interest, thus mapping the spatial information in the original image to another space to retain the important features in the image. The spatial domain attention mechanism is represented by the spatial transformation network (STN), which improves the performance of a convolutional neural network by spatially transforming the feature map tensor to extract key information and reduce the impact of minor features in the feature map tensor on the convolutional neural network [ 13 ]. Since the useful features contained in each channel in the feature map tensor are not the same, the use of the CA module can effectively weaken or suppress the adverse effects and interference of the features on the redundant channels in the feature map tensor on facial expression recognition.…”