2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-023-03231-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of food motives with red meat and legume consumption in the population-based DILGOM study

Annukka Hentilä,
Satu Männistö,
Niina E. Kaartinen
et al.

Abstract: Purpose To improve human health and environmental sustainability, red meat consumption should decrease and legume consumption increase in diets. More information on food motives, however, is required when developing more tailored and effective interventions targeting legume and meat consumption. We aimed to examine the associations between food motives and red meat and legume consumption, and whether these associations differ between different subgroups (gender, age groups, marital status, educat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose motives for food choices because the intervention improves knowledge and motivation. Indeed, food choice motives are a key factor for changing towards sustainable behaviours [ 41 44 , 46 ] and a measurement tool is available through a teen-friendly version of the questionnaire by Sautron and colleagues [ 62 ]. The questionnaire consists of 104 items divided into four categories: environmental, health and well-being, economic and miscellaneous (i.e.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose motives for food choices because the intervention improves knowledge and motivation. Indeed, food choice motives are a key factor for changing towards sustainable behaviours [ 41 44 , 46 ] and a measurement tool is available through a teen-friendly version of the questionnaire by Sautron and colleagues [ 62 ]. The questionnaire consists of 104 items divided into four categories: environmental, health and well-being, economic and miscellaneous (i.e.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%