2003
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of hip and thigh circumferences independent of waist circumference with the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study

Abstract: Large hip and thigh circumferences are associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, independently of BMI, age, and waist circumference, whereas a larger waist circumference is associated with a higher risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

35
340
2
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
35
340
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicts some studies (Rexrode et al, 1998;Snijder et al, 2003). Intuitively, waist-hip ratio captures body fat distribution.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Ratesmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contradicts some studies (Rexrode et al, 1998;Snijder et al, 2003). Intuitively, waist-hip ratio captures body fat distribution.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Ratesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Large hip circumference is found to be associated with a lower risk of diabetes, independent of BMI and WC (Seidell et al, 1997;Snijder et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Anthropometric measurements of weight (Seca balance scale; Schinkel, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands), height (Harpenden Stadiometer; Holtain, Crosswell, UK) and waist and hip circumference [28] were performed. One cannula was retrogradely placed in a heated dorsal hand vein to obtain arterialised blood.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, whereas abdominal fat increases risk, thigh girth has been found to have a protective effect for both heart disease and type 2 diabetes. [19][20][21] Second, sagittal diameter has been found to be more strongly associated than waist circumference with visceral fat, 22,23 and likewise more closely associated with risk of the metabolic syndrome. [24][25][26][27] Collectively, these studies highlight an untapped potential of body shape indices to evaluate health status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%