2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of neighborhood disadvantage and offender concentration with criminal behavior: Between-within analysis in Finnish registry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several social, physical, and resource-based factors inherent to neighborhoods (eg, crime, cohesion among neighbors, presence of toxicants, access to libraries, school quality) change the nature of a child’s interaction with their environment, 70 which could explain neighborhood-associated alterations in sociocognitive functions. 63 , 71 , 72 For example, higher crime rates in poorer neighborhoods 31 , 32 could contribute to increased stress, 33 which is linked with executive function. 73 , 74 Neuroimaging investigations have examined whether and which of these proximal factors may be associated with brain alterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several social, physical, and resource-based factors inherent to neighborhoods (eg, crime, cohesion among neighbors, presence of toxicants, access to libraries, school quality) change the nature of a child’s interaction with their environment, 70 which could explain neighborhood-associated alterations in sociocognitive functions. 63 , 71 , 72 For example, higher crime rates in poorer neighborhoods 31 , 32 could contribute to increased stress, 33 which is linked with executive function. 73 , 74 Neuroimaging investigations have examined whether and which of these proximal factors may be associated with brain alterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, we hypothesized that because parent educational attainment is posited to play a role in shaping sources of cognitive stimulation and language input and complexity, 24 , 30 it would be independently associated with the structure of temporal regions. In addition, because neighborhood disadvantage can be associated with increased stress in children (eg, due to exposure to violent crime), 31 , 32 , 33 it may be independently associated with the morphology of brain regions involved in the body’s stress response (eg, medial prefrontal cortex). 34 , 35 Finally, although we expected interactions between the SES indicators (eg, that high parent or caregiver income and educational attainment would mitigate the effects of living in a poor neighborhood), we did not make specific hypotheses about which brain regions would be implicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, children who live in highly deprived neighborhoods have been found to have less supportive social environments for physical activity compared to children who live in more a uent areas [47]. This may be due to the fact that highly deprived neighborhoods are usually characterized as neighborhoods with higher crime rates,, [48,49] which does not foster a safe and encouraging environment for outdoor activities [50]. Further, children who live in highly deprived areas, experience higher food insecurity compared to children living in low deprived areas [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial portion of animal crime in the U.S. is associated with urban crime in areas characterized by concentrated racial segregation and disadvantage. Recent research in Finland that combines individual and community-level factors (e.g., economic disadvantage) finds that individual-level factors are more important, but not exclusive, determinants of criminal activity (Airaksinen et al, 2021). While this may also be the case for animal crime, further research is needed, ideally requiring largescale individual-level data that includes measures of offenses against animals, as well as other offenses, background characteristics, and community structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%