We thank Kirby et al. for their thoughtful comments regarding our recent work and are excited that this case report generated thoughts within the scientific community about the vascular physiological effects of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use and cessation. We would also like to respond to a few of the authors' major comments, as we believe the interpretation of the presented data is complex, and we had limited space to elaborate on multiple points in the case report format. We would like to begin by agreeing with Kirby et al. regarding the multiple important positive aspects of OCP use. Despite apparent, positive attributes of OCP, significant gaps in the literature remain (Williams & MacDonald, 2021), particularly regarding long-term use, post-OCP use, assessments in the microvasculature and underlying mechanisms. We believe this work (Turner, Stanhewicz, Nielsen, & Wong, 2023) and our other recently published work (Turner, Stanhewicz, Nielsen, Otis et al., 2023) help inform these areas, and further research is important for improved informed decision-making. Another major comment from Kirby et al. regards the concurrent interpretation of maximal cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) alongside percentage maximal CVC (%CVC max ) values in response to local heating (i.e., plateau, a representative measure of general endothelium-dependent vasodilatation). We agree that the observed greater maximal CVC during OCP use compared with maximal CVC after cessation of use is intriguing and may, as mentioned, suggest greater endothelium-independent vasodilatation during OCP use. Kirby et al. also refer to a similar, albeit not statistically significant, observation in our more recently published work assessing cutaneous endothelium-dependent vasodilatation between women in estimated low hormone phases of the natural menstrual cycle or OCP use and men (Turner, Stanhewicz, Nielsen, Otis et al., 2023).Although it is possible that endothelium-independent vasodilatation is augmented in women using OCP, it is important to highlight that endothelium-independent vasodilatation was not a primary outcome variable in either this case report or our other recent work (Turner, Stanhewicz, Nielsen, Otis et al., 2023). Therefore, we were not powered to accurately assess differences in endothelium-independent vasodilatation. Williams and MacDonald (2021) recently reviewed the This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.