2020
DOI: 10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.1.pet
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associative and Gender Aspects of the Emotional Concept of Jealousy in the Ukrainian Linguistic Culture

Abstract: The article deals with the associative and gender features of the perception by marriage partners of the emotional concept of "jealousy" within the framework of Ukrainian linguistic culture. Associative and gender features of the emotional concept of “jealousy” were found out as a result of data analysis of free word association test held with 100 Ukrainian speaking students, graduate students, and teachers (50 men and 50 women) at Khmelnytskyi National University (Ukraine). The respondents were in off… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodology of the research, which is grounded on the aim, requires an integrative multidisciplinary approach that combines the methods and former research findings of such disciplines as cognitive linguistics (principles of interconnection of language and cognition (Bieliekhova et al, 2018;Kubriakova 2002), reconstruction of cultural concepts based on language data (Karasik et al, 2005)), psycholinguistics (the study of psycholinguistic processes in the broad context of thought and communication, necessity of simultaneous analysis of linguistic and psychological information (Ahrens, 2012;Bruner, 1975;Wertsch, 2009), gender aspects of concepts in discourses and narrations (Petiak, 2020;Stampino, 2014;Wall, 1994), the study of language as active and purposeful language activity (Bergen, 2012;Vygotskyi, 1996)), border studies (correlation of the notions of borders, borderlands, borderscapes (Brambilla, Laine, Scott, & Bocchi, 2017;Fellner, 2009;Schimanski, 2019;Wille, 2016)), discourse studies (theory of discourse as a cognitive and communicative phenomenon (Bondarenko, Martynyuk, Frolova, & Shevchenko, 2017;Gee & Handford, 2014;Prikhodko, 2013)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Methodology of the research, which is grounded on the aim, requires an integrative multidisciplinary approach that combines the methods and former research findings of such disciplines as cognitive linguistics (principles of interconnection of language and cognition (Bieliekhova et al, 2018;Kubriakova 2002), reconstruction of cultural concepts based on language data (Karasik et al, 2005)), psycholinguistics (the study of psycholinguistic processes in the broad context of thought and communication, necessity of simultaneous analysis of linguistic and psychological information (Ahrens, 2012;Bruner, 1975;Wertsch, 2009), gender aspects of concepts in discourses and narrations (Petiak, 2020;Stampino, 2014;Wall, 1994), the study of language as active and purposeful language activity (Bergen, 2012;Vygotskyi, 1996)), border studies (correlation of the notions of borders, borderlands, borderscapes (Brambilla, Laine, Scott, & Bocchi, 2017;Fellner, 2009;Schimanski, 2019;Wille, 2016)), discourse studies (theory of discourse as a cognitive and communicative phenomenon (Bondarenko, Martynyuk, Frolova, & Shevchenko, 2017;Gee & Handford, 2014;Prikhodko, 2013)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%