The theory presented by Grice, Nullmeyer, and Spiker (1977) has been applied successfully to experiments with three levels of auditory similarity in choice reaction time. A defect in the original statement of the relation between theoretical probabilities and response probability is corrected. Similarity affects both positive associative strength and associative inhibition. The short-latency process of associative inhibition is especially sensitive to increasing levels of similarity. Descriptions of the speed-accuracy tradeoff as it depends upon stimulus similarity are presented. The forms of stimulus generalization gradients are shown to depend upon response latency. Common sets of theoretical functions described both group and individual subject latency distributions. As before, three individual difference variables are identified as mean criterion level, amount of criterion variability, and inhibitory ability. Multiple regression analysis of these three variables and error rate reveals interesting and interpretable features of information processing dynamics. One of these features is that the amount of criterion variability may be more important in determining error rate than the mean level of the criterion. Also included are comments on a critique by Link (1979) and a discussion of the relation between this approach and more formal deductive models.Early applications of variable criterion analysis led to the development of a theory of simple reaction time (SRT) (Grice, Hunt, Kushner, & Morrow, 1974) and disjunctive reaction time (DRT) of the c-reaction type (Grice, Hunt, Kushner, & Nullmeyer, 1976). More recently, we have presented an empirically derived theory of choice reaction time (CRT) (Grice, Nullmeyer, & Spiker, 1977). The result is a structure of some generality in that, when the same stimuli are used, functions obtained in SRT and DRT experiments become components of the CRT theory. According to this view, the excitatory strength (E) leading to response evocation increases as some deterministic function of time following stimulus onset. Response evocation occurs when the strength of E reaches a preset criterion value (C) which is specific to the trial. Over trials, the criterion is a normally distributed random variable with mean C and standard deviation a. The mean and variability of the criterion distribution are determined by task variables, instructions, set, attention, motivation, adaptation, and individual differences.As a scientific approach, our theoretical research is, at present, somewhat unconventional, and also, we fear, not fully understood. This is exemplified in a recent critique by Link (1979). While we believe his criticism to be correct in one important respect to be discussed later, it appears that his more general recommendations are based on a complete misunderstanding of our scientific goals and strategy. Our approach is not that of a simple, purely deductive model of the kind now most common in mathematical psychology. In addition to the usual deductive aspect of theory, we s...