Associative recall in verbal-discrimination learning as related to pronunciation and degree of practice

Sardello, Robert J.; Kausler, Donald H.

doi:10.3758/bf03331647

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…P than in Cond. S. This prediction has been confirmed in experiments by Kausler and Sardello (1967), Sardello and Kausler (1967), and by Underwood and Freund (1968). In each case, Cond.…”

Section: Washington State Universitysupporting

confidence: 62%

Pronunciation and the length of the study interval in verbal discrimination.

Hopkins¹,

Epling²

1971

Journal of Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…P than in Cond. S. This prediction has been confirmed in experiments by Kausler and Sardello (1967), Sardello and Kausler (1967), and by Underwood and Freund (1968). In each case, Cond.…”

Section: Washington State Universitysupporting

confidence: 62%

Pronunciation and the length of the study interval in verbal discrimination.

Hopkins¹,

Epling²

1971

Journal of Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The absence of an effect for directionality of associative recall could be viewed as evidence for the symmetry of W-R and R-W learning. Sardello and Kausler (1967) have also reported equal amounts of W-R and R-W recall for lists containing words of high meaningfulness. On the other hand, other evidence has indicated (Battig, Williams, & Williams, 1962;Keppel, 1966) that W-R recall exceeds R-W recall when either nonsense syllables or words of low meaningfulness make up the lists.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 88%

Effects of double functioning on verbal discrimination learning.

Kausler¹,

Boka²

1968

Journal of Experimental Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evidence for the learning of double function verbal discrimination lists i.e., lists in which the same words serve as both wrong (W) and right (R) items, was found, but the rate of learning was markedly slower than that for single function lists (i.e., lists in which different words serve as W and R items). Performance on double function lists was also found to covary positively with subsequent recall of W-R and R-W associations. Presumably, associative processes provide discriminable cues for recognizing R items in double function lists when differential frequency of responding to W and R items cannot reliably discriminate between intrapair W and R items.

show abstract

“…The present study attempted to enhance IAR activation by replacing the first VD list with a free-recall learning task which contained associates of subsequent VD-list W or R items. The freerecall learning procedure ensures the priming of implicit associative response mechanisms but avoids the development of intrapair incidental associative learning (Sardello & Kausler, 1967) and the resultant interference in transfer associated with prior List 1 VD learning. Others (e.g., Kanak & Dean, 1969;Kausler & Dean, 1967) have shown that incidental associative interference may be involved in the Wi-Ri, W2-R/ and Wi-Ri, Wi'-Ra paradigms as well as other paradigms involving potential associative competition-unlearning relationships.…”

Section: University Of Oklahomamentioning

confidence: 99%