Assortative mating and fragmentation within dog breeds

Abstract

BackgroundThere are around 400 internationally recognized dog breeds in the world today, with a remarkable diversity in size, shape, color and behavior. Breeds are considered to be uniform groups with similar physical characteristics, shaped by selection rooted in human preferences. This has led to a large genetic difference between breeds and a large extent of linkage disequilibrium within breeds. These characteristics are important for association mapping of candidate genes for diseases and therefore make dogs ideal models for gene mapping of human disorders. However, genetic uniformity within breeds may not always be the case. We studied patterns of genetic diversity within 164 poodles and compared it to 133 dogs from eight other breeds.ResultsOur analyses revealed strong population structure within poodles, with differences among some poodle groups as pronounced as those among other well-recognized breeds. Pedigree analysis going three generations back in time confirmed that subgroups within poodles result from assortative mating imposed by breed standards as well as breeder preferences. Matings have not taken place at random or within traditionally identified size classes in poodles. Instead, a novel set of five poodle groups was identified, defined by combinations of size and color, which is not officially recognized by the kennel clubs. Patterns of genetic diversity in other breeds suggest that assortative mating leading to fragmentation may be a common feature within many dog breeds.ConclusionThe genetic structure observed in poodles is the result of local mating patterns, implying that breed fragmentation may be different in different countries. Such pronounced structuring within dog breeds can increase the power of association mapping studies, but also represents a serious problem if ignored.In dog breeding, individuals are selected on the basis of morphology, behaviour, working or show purposes, as well as geographic population structure. The same processes which have historically created dog breeds are still ongoing, and create further subdivision within current dog breeds.

The genomic architecture of segmental duplications and associated copy number variants in dogs

“…The somewhat lower level of polymorphism in this boxer, however, does not necessarily imply genetic homogeneity within boxers or other breeds (Parker et al 2004;Sutter and Ostrander 2004;Wayne and Ostrander 2007). Indeed, a number of recent data sets and analyses suggest considerable genetic diversity exists within breeds Bjornerfeldt et al 2008), which is consistent with our observation of segregating CNVs among boxers.…”

Man's Best Friend Becomes Biology's Best in Show: Genome Analyses in the Domestic Dog

“…They found that stratification depends on population size and breeding strategies, with some breeds having experienced sufficient outbreeding to exist as a single breed across continents, whereas others are as divergent as distinct breeds. Also, Bjornerfeldt reported breed stratification based on color preferences in the poodle (12). The use of the poodle breed to map a disease gene would therefore require careful correction for the overrepresentation of one color within selected datasets.…”

Test for personality characteristics in dogs used in research

“…Genetic analyses have not only found great variation across different dog breeds but have also revealed a substantial intrabreed variation (Parker et al, 2004;Bjornerfeldt et al, 2008). The richness of phenotypes within the dog species provides great potential for the dog as a model animal.…”