1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02359888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assortative mating for relative weight: Genetic implications

Abstract: Most work on the genetics of relative weight has not considered the role of assortative mating, i.e., mate selection based on similarity between mates. We investigated the extent to which engaged men and women in an archival longitudinal database were similar to each other in relative body weight prior to marriage and cohabitation. After controlling for age, a small but statistically significant mate correlation was found for relative weight (r=.13, p=.023), indicating some assortative mating. Furthermore, we … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
69
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous studies in Norway, 55 Australia 56 and the United States 57 found that the spousal correlations of BMI were independent of the marriage duration and thus lent no support to the effect of marital environment. A previous Finnish study, using information on twins and their spouses, found that about half of the spousal correlation in BMI could be attributed to phenotypic assortment and half to social homogamy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, previous studies in Norway, 55 Australia 56 and the United States 57 found that the spousal correlations of BMI were independent of the marriage duration and thus lent no support to the effect of marital environment. A previous Finnish study, using information on twins and their spouses, found that about half of the spousal correlation in BMI could be attributed to phenotypic assortment and half to social homogamy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, this association with BMI can be underlined as well with the strong significant correlations between almost all spouses' adiposity parameters, and even between their respective evolutions over 9 y. Cross-sectional resemblances between spouses could be due to assortative mating phenomena, which involve genes and environmental factors indistinguishably. 25 However, longitudinal results suggest an important contribution of a common environment to the familial aggregation of fatness. Hunt et al 26 also showed that changes in BMI and adiposity among Canadian families significantly aggregated within families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to infer an assortative mating effect based on cross-sectional observations, as the spousal resemblance could arise from assortative mating, common environmental influences, or the differential survival of marriages of spouses more similar to one another. 7 However, a correlation of 0.13 for relative weight has been demonstrated among pairs of spouses, prior to marriage or cohabitation, suggesting that there is a small assortative mating effect. 7 Additionally, the spousal resemblance for BMI and SF5 did not increase over time in the 7 y follow-up (Campbell's Survey) of the CFS, suggesting that, at least over the short term, the shared household environment was not leading to increases in spousal similarity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 However, a correlation of 0.13 for relative weight has been demonstrated among pairs of spouses, prior to marriage or cohabitation, suggesting that there is a small assortative mating effect. 7 Additionally, the spousal resemblance for BMI and SF5 did not increase over time in the 7 y follow-up (Campbell's Survey) of the CFS, suggesting that, at least over the short term, the shared household environment was not leading to increases in spousal similarity. 6 The worldwide prevalence of obesity is increasing at an alarming rate, and the results of the present study suggest that genetic factors may be playing a role in the increasing rates of obesity through assortative mating for body fatness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%