2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assortment planning of automotive products with considerations for economic and environmental impacts of technology selection

Abstract: A manufacturer's assortment is the set of products that the company offers to its customers. Assortment planning considerably affects both the sales revenue and product offering costs for the company and it had experienced growing attention across different industries over recent decades. In this study, we propose a modeling framework that seeks to identify the optimal assortment for a manufacturer of configurable products (in particular, automobiles). Our model accounts for environmental considerations (Corpo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the large number of bill of material (BOM) alternatives in the early concept phase makes it prohibitive to consider as part of DfSCM efforts (Taghavi, 2012;Taghavi and Chinnam, 2014), the accounting for environmental sustainability in addition to standard supply chain cost models and metrics further makes this complexity even more serious (Umpfenbach, 2013). Hence, one main component of this focus area might be to develop novel optimization methods to address these challenges.…”
Section: Focus Area 4: Joint Optimization Of the Best Subset Of Desigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the large number of bill of material (BOM) alternatives in the early concept phase makes it prohibitive to consider as part of DfSCM efforts (Taghavi, 2012;Taghavi and Chinnam, 2014), the accounting for environmental sustainability in addition to standard supply chain cost models and metrics further makes this complexity even more serious (Umpfenbach, 2013). Hence, one main component of this focus area might be to develop novel optimization methods to address these challenges.…”
Section: Focus Area 4: Joint Optimization Of the Best Subset Of Desigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the automotive industry finds itself in a position where multiple alternative fuel and powertrain technologies are challenging the dominant internal combustion engine vehicle design (Orsato and Wells, 2007;Zapata and Niewwenhuis, 2010). Technology competition in the motor vehicle industry has been intensively studied; from the technological perspective (Hoed, 2007;Bakker et al, 2012), the policy perspective (Browne et al, 2012;Sushandoyo and Magnusson, 2014), the economic and environmental impact perspective (Dhingra and Das, 2014;Taghavi and Chinnam, 2014) and a combination of these viewpoints (Oltra and Saint Jean, 2009). Patent based studies have noted strong interest in radical innovation paths (Rizzi et al, 2014;Golembiewski et al, 2015) and the potential for a new dominant design (Thiel et al, 2010;Bakker et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the automotive industry, Maddulapalli et al (2013) show that car manufacturers can achieve higher contribution margins through assortment planning while complying with CO 2 fleet emission thresholds. Taghavi and Chinnam (2014) conclude that, in the short term, the increased sale of diesel vehicles and, in the medium term, the market launch of more mature hybrid and battery electric vehicles is necessary to achieve both financial and environmental goals in the US market. Umpfenbach et al (2017) illustrate the influence of emission thresholds on the characteristics of the optimal product portfolio as well as the resulting sales and profits.…”
Section: Literature: Approaches To Vehicle Project Portfolio Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%