Assuming Personal Responsibility for Sexual Victimization: Harmful But Potentially Adaptive for College Women?

Abstract

Survivors of sexual trauma often experience pervasive adverse cognitive attributions, such as assuming responsibility for victimization. In fact, these negative outcomes were recently included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) criterion for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and have garnered substantial research attention devoted toward investigating the effectiveness of empirically supported trauma treatments in altering and reducing maladaptive belief systems. However, less is known about the ways that these negative cognitions may be inadvertently serving an adaptive role in young women's healing and recovery from sexual trauma. The present study examined relationships between situational aspects of sexual victimization, personal responsibility, self-esteem, perceived future control, and perceived future likelihood of assault recurrence using path analysis in a sample of college women ( n = 347) who had experienced sexual victimization. Increased physical harm, decreased intoxication of the male, increased survivor intoxication, and decreased clarity of nonconsent were associated with increased personal responsibility, which was positively associated with self-esteem and perceived future control. Self-esteem mediated a negative relationship between personal responsibility and perceived future likelihood of assault recurrence, while perceived future control mediated a positive relationship. Findings suggest that college women's tendency to assume personal responsibility for sexual victimization experiences is a complicated double-edged sword with both harmful and adaptive effects. Innovative, comprehensive, and sophisticated approaches to sexual assault prevention and treatment are needed to more effectively address this issue and support young women's healing and recovery from victimization.

Evolving a Consent-Based Sexual Encounter

“…It is therefore worth noting the social and psychological costs of Fooccer. The effects of this persistent sexual harassment on women are already well documented (Wrangham & Muller, 2009;Harding, 2015;Donde & Ragsdale, 2017). A recent publication stands out in a self-revealing way.…”

Restoring victims’ confidence: Victim-centred restorative practices

“…Feelings of guilt and its counterpart, blame, can intensify negative self-images and feelings of shame and self-doubt (Karakurt et al, 2014;Pemberton, 2019). Self-blame seems to be a doubleedged sword: Although the victim assumes blame for something that is not their fault, in doing so they are able to maintain a sense of control and believe that they can reduce their likelihood of future victimization (Davis et al, 1997;Donde and Ragsdale, 2021;Janoff-Bulman, 1982). Based on qualitative interviews with rape victims, Hansen et al (2021) report that for the victims to move on and start to heal after the rape, the women would often assume blame for why the rape happened, even if objectively the rape was not their fault.…”