1990
DOI: 10.1080/01431169008955124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assumptions implicit in remote sensing data acquisition and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In each time slot, two images were acquired for spring (April) and summer (August) to detect phenological differences in the various LULC and especially the most dynamic ones such as meadows, phrygana and arable land. When using multi-temporal images, calibration and georeferencing are necessary prior to classification and change detection [41]. In our case, we used images that were pre-processed at Level 1 (geometric corrections in UTM WGS84 projection), and we applied an absolute atmospheric correction using Dark Object Subtraction algorithm (DOS) in ENVI 5.5 software.…”
Section: Object-oriented Classification For Lulc Change Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each time slot, two images were acquired for spring (April) and summer (August) to detect phenological differences in the various LULC and especially the most dynamic ones such as meadows, phrygana and arable land. When using multi-temporal images, calibration and georeferencing are necessary prior to classification and change detection [41]. In our case, we used images that were pre-processed at Level 1 (geometric corrections in UTM WGS84 projection), and we applied an absolute atmospheric correction using Dark Object Subtraction algorithm (DOS) in ENVI 5.5 software.…”
Section: Object-oriented Classification For Lulc Change Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the complexity of (1) which involves the optimization of a global distribution model of the image and due to the equivalence of MRF and Gibbs random field (Duggin and Robinove, 1990), (Geman and Geman, 1984), this optimization problem can be simplified and resolved by minimizing the sum of local posterior energies (2) (Geman and Geman, 1984):…”
Section: The Potts Mrf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant problem in the atmospheric correction of remotely sensed data is the difficulty of obtaining accurate values for those parameters described in the radiative transfer equation (Kaufman and Sendra 1988) or the limited availability of the atmospheric correction parameters in the analysis of most images (Duggin and Robinove 1990). The basic philosophy of atmospheric correction is to determine the optical characteristics of the atmosphere and then to apply this to correct the satellite image data.…”
Section: Atmospheric Correction Of Satellite Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%