2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asteroid mass estimation with the robust adaptive Metropolis algorithm

Abstract: Context. The bulk density of an asteroid informs us about its interior structure and composition. To constrain the bulk density one needs an estimate for the mass of the asteroid. The mass is estimated by analyzing an asteroid's gravitational interaction with another object, such as another asteroid during a close encounter. An estimate for the mass has typically been obtained with linearized leastsquares methods despite the fact that this family of methods is not able to properly describe non-Gaussian paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining our new volume estimates with the average of available mass estimates determined in Viikinkoski et al (2018) yields a density of 4.20 ± 0.60 g cm −3 for MPCD and 4.10 ± 0.61 g cm −3 for ADAM. We did not include the lower mass (1.5 × 10 19 kg) derived by Siltala & Granvik (2020) in the mass estimation as we consider this value to be an outlier. The physical characteristics of our new models compared to those of previous works are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Bulk Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining our new volume estimates with the average of available mass estimates determined in Viikinkoski et al (2018) yields a density of 4.20 ± 0.60 g cm −3 for MPCD and 4.10 ± 0.61 g cm −3 for ADAM. We did not include the lower mass (1.5 × 10 19 kg) derived by Siltala & Granvik (2020) in the mass estimation as we consider this value to be an outlier. The physical characteristics of our new models compared to those of previous works are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Bulk Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only update to the algorithm presented in Siltala & Granvik (2020) is a slightly different acceptance criterion; where previously we computed the acceptance criterion with a single posterior probability density value based on the sum of the χ 2 values for all targets, we now consider the χ 2 values separately for each target and compute their product to obtain the final acceptance probability:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) where j represents each individual asteroid considered. Such an approach ensures that accepted proposals must fit each individual asteroid well as opposed to the criterion used by Siltala & Granvik (2020), which only required that the overall fit be acceptable. In addition, this means that each asteroid has the same weight in the acceptance criterion while with our previous approach the total χ 2 value and, by extension, acceptance criterion, is dominated by asteroids with more observations as such have a greater impact on the total value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations