2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asteroseismic analysis of variable hot subdwarf stars observed with TESS

Abstract: Context. We present photometric and spectroscopic analyses of gravity (g-mode) long-period pulsating hot subdwarf B (sdB) stars, also called V1093 Her stars, observed by the TESS space telescope in both 120 s short-cadence and 20 s ultra-short-cadence mode during the survey observation and the extended mission of the southern ecliptic hemisphere. Aims. We performed a detailed asteroseismic and spectroscopic analysis of five pulsating sdB stars observed with TESS in order to compare the observations with model … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stellar models presented in Uzundag et al (2021), the evolution tracks suggest that the lower value of period spacing, the lower value of log g. This agrees well to a low log g derived for EPIC 220422705. However, atmospheric parameters, with a much higher precision, are encouraged for EPIC 220422705 to test the results of Uzundag et al (2021) in future.…”
Section: Period Spacingsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As stellar models presented in Uzundag et al (2021), the evolution tracks suggest that the lower value of period spacing, the lower value of log g. This agrees well to a low log g derived for EPIC 220422705. However, atmospheric parameters, with a much higher precision, are encouraged for EPIC 220422705 to test the results of Uzundag et al (2021) in future.…”
Section: Period Spacingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We note that the real radial order can only be obtained through seismic modeling. Our results suggest that EPIC 220422705 has a somewhat large period spacing among the known sdB variables, in a range of [220,270] s for the dipole mode (see, e.g., Reed et al 2011;Sahoo et al 2020;Uzundag et al 2021). As stellar models presented in Uzundag et al (2021), the evolution tracks suggest that the lower value of period spacing, the lower value of log g. This agrees well to a low log g derived for EPIC 220422705.…”
Section: Period Spacingsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that the real radial order can only be obtained through seismic modeling. Our results suggest that EPIC 220422705 has a somewhat large period spacing among the known sdB variables, in a range of [220,270] s for the dipole mode (see, e.g., Reed et al 2011;Sahoo et al 2020;Uzundag et al 2021). As stellar models presented in Uzundag et al (2021), the evolution tracks suggest that the lower value of period spacing, the lower value of g log .…”
Section: Period Spacingmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This agrees well with a low g log derived for EPIC 220422705. However, atmospheric parameters, with much higher precision, are encouraged for EPIC 220422705 to test the results of Uzundag et al (2021) in the future. The échelle diagrams for two sequences are presented in Figure 4(d), where the ℓ = 2 sequence is more consistent than the ℓ = 1 sequence.…”
Section: Period Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%