2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asteroseismology of 19 low-luminosity red giant stars fromKepler

Abstract: Context. Frequencies of acoustic and mixed modes in red giant stars are now determined with high precision thanks to the long continuous observations provided by the NASA's Kepler mission. Here we consider the eigenfrequencies of nineteen low-luminosity red giant stars selected in a recent publication for a detailed peak-bagging analysis. Aims. Our objective is to obtain stellar parameters by using individual mode frequencies and spectroscopic information. Methods. We use a forward modelling technique based on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
37
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(68 reference statements)
4
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Though quick and simple to use, more robust estimations can be made when, for example, the average large frequency separations from model predicted radial mode frequencies and the use of gravity mode period spacings are considered in the parameter determinations (see Rodrigues et al 2017;Serenelli et al 2017). Though an improvement, these still do not exploit all of the information the individual modes contain, e.g., presence of acoustic glitches (Vorontsov 1988;Gough 1990;Miglio et al 2010;Pérez Hernández et al 2016;Verma et al 2017) and long term internal structure changes from curvature of the large frequency separation (Hekker & Christensen-Dalsgaard 2017;Mosser et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though quick and simple to use, more robust estimations can be made when, for example, the average large frequency separations from model predicted radial mode frequencies and the use of gravity mode period spacings are considered in the parameter determinations (see Rodrigues et al 2017;Serenelli et al 2017). Though an improvement, these still do not exploit all of the information the individual modes contain, e.g., presence of acoustic glitches (Vorontsov 1988;Gough 1990;Miglio et al 2010;Pérez Hernández et al 2016;Verma et al 2017) and long term internal structure changes from curvature of the large frequency separation (Hekker & Christensen-Dalsgaard 2017;Mosser et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the dimensionless frequencies of the p-modes change so slowly that interpolations between models introduce errors much lower than the observational ones. This procedure was discussed in more detail in [54] and was found safe and consumes relatively less time.…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A χ 2 minimization, including p-mode frequencies and spectroscopic data, was applied to the grid of models. The general procedure is similar to that described in [54], but for these stars all the eigenfrequencies are approximately in the p-mode asymptotic regime and hence a simplified procedure can be done. Specifically we minimize the function…”
Section: Fitting Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the case of solar‐like pulsating main‐sequence stars (e.g., see Lebreton & Goupil (); Silva Aguirre et al ()), the effectiveness of individual mode frequencies in determining stellar properties for giant stars has yet to be fully explored. However, when individual mode frequencies are available as additional constraints, expectations are that the precision and accuracy on the inferred radii and masses (hence age) of red giants are significantly improved (Huber et al (); Lillo‐Box et al (); Pérez Hernández et al ()). To illustrate the expected gain in precision when including radial‐mode frequencies, in Figure we show the posterior probability distribution functions for mass and age that we obtain by including different sets of constraints in the inference procedure.…”
Section: Expected Seismic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%