2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-01116-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asthenospheric low-velocity zone consistent with globally prevalent partial melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
36
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
11
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, most of the observational constraints of MLDs come from SRFs. In addition to the well-known sensitivity of the S-to-P amplitude in SRFs to isotropic V s changes, the amplitude is also affected by changes in radial anisotropy (e.g., extended Figure 6 in Hua et al, 2023), with the dependence involving both anisotropy amplitude and Kawakatsu's fifth parameter (η κ ; Kawakatsu, 2018). Despite the broad application of the SRF technique to studying MLDs, it also has three well-known limitations: First, the depth resolution is limited due to the low frequency range of teleseismic S waves and the small temporal separations between the S-to-P phases generated at different interfaces (Figure 1e in T. Liu & Shearer, 2021).…”
Section: Methods For Studying Mlds and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most of the observational constraints of MLDs come from SRFs. In addition to the well-known sensitivity of the S-to-P amplitude in SRFs to isotropic V s changes, the amplitude is also affected by changes in radial anisotropy (e.g., extended Figure 6 in Hua et al, 2023), with the dependence involving both anisotropy amplitude and Kawakatsu's fifth parameter (η κ ; Kawakatsu, 2018). Despite the broad application of the SRF technique to studying MLDs, it also has three well-known limitations: First, the depth resolution is limited due to the low frequency range of teleseismic S waves and the small temporal separations between the S-to-P phases generated at different interfaces (Figure 1e in T. Liu & Shearer, 2021).…”
Section: Methods For Studying Mlds and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is a heavily debated topic with several proposed hypotheses. Some studies proposed that the asthenosphere results from the presence of small amounts of partial melts in the upper mantle (Anderson & Spetzler, 1970; Chantel et al., 2016; Debayle et al., 2020; Hua et al., 2023), while others consider that the region is better explained by a subsolidus regime associated with rheological weakening of mantle rocks under temperatures that are close to the solidus (Karato, 2012; Takei, 2017). For the latter hypothesis, it has been suggested that dissolved water in olivine could effectively reduce the viscosity (Hirth & Kohlstedt, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the lithospheric evolution and origin of the Lithosphere‐Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB) is fundamentally important and widely debated. Popular hypotheses include thermal weakening of mineral structures (Chapman & Pollack, 1977), elastically accommodated grain boundary sliding (Karato, 2012; Karato et al., 2015); change in anisotropy (Rychert & Shearer, 2011; Rychert et al., 2007), stress induced amorphization at olivine grain boundaries (Samae et al., 2021) and the presence of partial melt (Debayle et al., 2020; Hua et al., 2023; Kovács et al., 2021; Rychert et al., 2020). Furthermore, the LAB contributes to our understanding of geodynamic processes in tectonically complex areas such as the Eastern‐Alps‐Carpathians‐Pannonian‐Dinarides region (ACPDR; Horváth et al., 2015; Rychert et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%