2020
DOI: 10.1080/15412555.2020.1817883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO) PRO-CON Debate. ACO: Call Me by My Name

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, despite disagreement on the definition and recognition of ACO as a distinct pathophysiological entity, 123,124 most clinicians and scientists agree that the current definitions of asthma and COPD misclassify a subgroup of patients with a different phenotype in terms of clinical presentation and, most importantly, in terms of clinical course. This is important because an appropriate identification of ACO patients may allow better-targeted therapy, and hopefully, improved clinical course, much like is currently done in asthma and COPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In conclusion, despite disagreement on the definition and recognition of ACO as a distinct pathophysiological entity, 123,124 most clinicians and scientists agree that the current definitions of asthma and COPD misclassify a subgroup of patients with a different phenotype in terms of clinical presentation and, most importantly, in terms of clinical course. This is important because an appropriate identification of ACO patients may allow better-targeted therapy, and hopefully, improved clinical course, much like is currently done in asthma and COPD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 1 First coined by Gibson et al in 2009, 2 asthma–COPD overlap (ACO) has gathered much global interest in the past decade, resulting in >350 publications on the subject within the past 5 years alone (PubMed search string as of 09 March 2021: “asthma-COPD overlap”). So why, despite this increased knowledge and interest in ACO, 3 has Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) chosen to revise its position? 4 The answer to this may lie in the lack of a unified definition for ACO.…”
Section: Aco: No Longer Fit For Purpose?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beide Krankheiten umfassen sehr heterogene Phänotypen und werden in nationalen wie internationalen Leitlinien als eigenständige Krankheitsentitäten definiert und klar voneinander abgegrenzt [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Viele Patienten mit obstruktiven Atemwegserkrankungen haben im klinischen Alltag Merkmale von Asthma und COPD, daher wurde 2014 in einem gemeinsamen GINA-GOLD-Dokument erstmals das Asthma-COPD-Overlap-Syndrom (ACOS) beschrieben "as characterized by persistent airflow limitation with several features usually associated with asthma and several features usually associated with COPD" [7,8]. Dieses Konsensuspapier sollte weitere Studien zur Charakterisierung und Behandlung von ACOS stimulieren; tatsächlich haben die Publikationen zum ACO(S) in Pubmed seitdem zugenommen, zurzeit wieder abnehmend und überwiegend Übersichtsartikel und weniger Originalarbeiten.…”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified
“…Dieses Konsensuspapier sollte weitere Studien zur Charakterisierung und Behandlung von ACOS stimulieren; tatsächlich haben die Publikationen zum ACO(S) in Pubmed seitdem zugenommen, zurzeit wieder abnehmend und überwiegend Übersichtsartikel und weniger Originalarbeiten. GOLD ist 2020 von ACO (mittlerweile ohne S) abgerückt [2,8]: "We no longer refer to asthma-COPD overlap (ACO), instead we emphasize that asthma and COPD are different disorders, although they may share common traits and clinical features (e. g. eosinophilia, some degree of reversibility)".…”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified