“…CBF responses to whisker stimulation were repeated in the presence of the following inhibitors administered topically onto the brain surface of separate groups of animals: HET0016 (inhibitor of 20‐hydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (20‐HETE) production, 10 −6 mol L −1 for 30 min; Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Liu et al ., 2008), MS‐PPOH (inhibitor of EET production, 20 × 10 −6 mol L −1 for 30 min; Cayman Chemicals) (Shi et al ., 2008), L‐NAME (N ω ‐Nitro‐L‐arginine methyl ester, inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, 10 −4 mol L −1 for 20 min; Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.), apocynin (inhibitor of NADPH oxidases, 3 × 10 −4 mol L −1 for 30 min; Cayman Chemicals), fluoroacetate sodium (inhibitor of the tricarboxylic acid cycle predominantly in glial cells, 10 −4 mol L −1 min; Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) (Fonnum et al ., 1997; Lecrux et al ., 2012), indomethacin (cyclooxygenase inhibitor, 5 × 10 −4 mol L −1 ; Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) (Kitaura et al ., 2007), MPEP (6‐Methyl‐2‐(phenylethynyl)pyridine hydrochloride, group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) subtype 5 antagonist, 5 × 10 −5 mol L −1 ) (Zonta et al ., 2003), and the NMDA (N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate) receptor antagonist D‐APV (D‐2‐Amino‐5‐Phosphonovaleric acid, 5 × 10 −5 mol L −1 ; Cayman Chemicals) (Stobart et al ., 2013). In a separate series of experiments ( n = 8 in each group), CBF responses to topical administration of L‐glutamate (500 μmol L −1 ) (Hall et al ., 2014) were determined in the absence and presence of MPEP (5 × 10 −5 mol L −1 ) and D‐APV (5 × 10 −5 mol L −1 ) (Stobart et al ., 2013). CBF responses to acetylcholine (ACh; 10 −5 mol L −1 ) were also obtained to assess maximal endothelial NO‐mediated responses.…”