2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9d9a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Astrophysical Implications on Hyperon Couplings and Hyperon Star Properties with Relativistic Equations of States

Abstract: Hyperons are essential constituents in the neutron star interior. The poorly known hyperonic interaction is a source of uncertainty for studying laboratory hypernuclei and neutron star observations. In this work, we perform Bayesian inference of phenomenological hyperon–nucleon interactions using the tidal deformability measurement of the GW170817 binary neutron star merger as detected by LIGO/Virgo and the mass–radius measurements of PSR J0030+0541 and PSR J0740+6620 as detected by NICER. The analysis is base… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the preferred emission pattern and viewing geometry, the mass and radius inferred by R19 for PSR J0030+0451 was M 1.34 0.16 0.15 -+  and 12.71 1.19 1.14 -+ km, where the uncertainties, here and throughout this work, are specified at approximately the 16% and 84% quantiles in the 1D marginal posterior (for comparison, Miller et al 2019 km). The mass and radius posteriors have since been used in a variety of studies to constrain the EoS (see, for example, Raaijmakers et al 2021;Tang et al 2021;Biswas 2022;Sabatucci et al 2022;Rutherford et al 2023;Sun et al 2023). The fact that PSR J0030+0451 has an inferred radius similar to that inferred for the ∼2.1 M e pulsar PSR J0740+6620 (Fonseca et al 2021;Miller et al 2021;Riley et al 2021;Salmi et al 2022), despite the much lower inferred mass, is particularly notable (Raaijmakers et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the preferred emission pattern and viewing geometry, the mass and radius inferred by R19 for PSR J0030+0451 was M 1.34 0.16 0.15 -+  and 12.71 1.19 1.14 -+ km, where the uncertainties, here and throughout this work, are specified at approximately the 16% and 84% quantiles in the 1D marginal posterior (for comparison, Miller et al 2019 km). The mass and radius posteriors have since been used in a variety of studies to constrain the EoS (see, for example, Raaijmakers et al 2021;Tang et al 2021;Biswas 2022;Sabatucci et al 2022;Rutherford et al 2023;Sun et al 2023). The fact that PSR J0030+0451 has an inferred radius similar to that inferred for the ∼2.1 M e pulsar PSR J0740+6620 (Fonseca et al 2021;Miller et al 2021;Riley et al 2021;Salmi et al 2022), despite the much lower inferred mass, is particularly notable (Raaijmakers et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For in-stance, a comprehensive macroscopic-microscopic model was developed to evaluate the total energies of eveneven nuclei with proton numbers ranging from 8 to 110 [62]. Even with the appearance of a hyperon [63,64], larger maximum masses of neutron stars could be obtained with DD-LZ1 than with several other RMF parameter sets, providing the possibility that the secondary object observed in GW190814 is a neutron star [65−67]. Utilizing the Thomas-Fermi approximation, different microscopic structures of nonuniform nuclear matter were calculated for the crust of neutron stars, and a unified equation of state was established in a vast density range [68,69].…”
Section: Nnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radio timing measurements of high pulsar masses (Antoniadis et al 2013;Arzoumanian et al 2018;Cromartie et al 2020;Fonseca et al 2021;Shamohammadi et al 2023) and gravitational-wave (GW) measurements of tidal deformability from neutron star binary mergers (Abbott et al 2019(Abbott et al , 2020 have now been supplemented by measurements of neutron star mass and radius for X-ray pulsars using data from the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER; Gendreau et al 2016). These astrophysical measurements have been used in various analyses, often in combination with constraints from nuclear theory and laboratory experiments, to place limits on the properties of neutron-rich matter, possible quark or hyperon phases in neutron star cores, and the presence of dark matter in and around neutron stars (see, e.g., Legred et al 2021;Miller et al 2021;Raaijmakers et al 2021a;Biswas 2022;Huth et al 2022;Miao et al 2022;Annala et al 2023;Giangrandi et al 2023;Rutherford et al 2023;Sun et al 2023;Takátsy et al 2023;Koehn et al 2024;Kurkela et al 2024;Pang et al 2024;Shakeri & Karkevandi 2024).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%