2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asylum seeking and irregular migration

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… It is possible to introduce into the model the risk of getting caught in attempting to enter the host country and being repatriated by the authorities, as in Woodland and Yoshida () and Djajić () or getting caught and deported while working in the host country, as in Djajić and Vinogradova () and Vinogradova (). An increase in the risk of deportation would reduce a worker's net benefit of undocumented migration in a way that is very similar to that of an increase in K TF .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… It is possible to introduce into the model the risk of getting caught in attempting to enter the host country and being repatriated by the authorities, as in Woodland and Yoshida () and Djajić () or getting caught and deported while working in the host country, as in Djajić and Vinogradova () and Vinogradova (). An increase in the risk of deportation would reduce a worker's net benefit of undocumented migration in a way that is very similar to that of an increase in K TF .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to assumption A1, refugees gain utility by staying in any country that provides protection, but they have a strong preference to seek protection in their favoured country (assumption A3). We adhere to Djajic () in assuming that an expected income, which varies among different locations, determines the utility function. The variety of parameters determining the preferences is condensed to a coefficient ε that leads to higher expected income and thus a stronger preference for one country.…”
Section: The Provision Dilemma Of Humanitarian Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have c i = w i ε + A 0 and c − i = w − i + A 0 , whereby w i and w − i are fixed and A 0 describes an asset the refugee holds (see Djajic, ). Introducing ε allows us to account for the heterogeneous preferences of refugees: ε determines the characteristics each refugee associates with one country, based on personal and structural reasons, network effect, language and culture.…”
Section: The Provision Dilemma Of Humanitarian Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar type of an arrangement is currently being used to bring migrants from Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa to the West. I consider here a somewhat richer contractual framework, developed by Djajić andVinogradova (2013, 2014), which enables the migrant to optimally choose the duration of the repayment period. This type of arrangement is very common in the case of DB migration from South-East Asia to the advanced countries of East Asia (see Jones and Pardthaisong, 1999;Sobieszczyk, 2000;Djajić and Vinogradova, 2013).…”
Section: Debt-bonded Migration With Financial Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Kwong () and Gao (). Financial support from the family network also plays an important role in influencing migration decisions of asylum seekers (see Djajić, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%