2023
DOI: 10.1063/5.0128102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric adaptivity induces recurrent synchronization in complex networks

Abstract: Rhythmic activities that alternate between coherent and incoherent phases are ubiquitous in chemical, ecological, climate, or neural systems. Despite their importance, general mechanisms for their emergence are little understood. In order to fill this gap, we present a framework for describing the emergence of recurrent synchronization in complex networks with adaptive interactions. This phenomenon is manifested at the macroscopic level by temporal episodes of coherent and incoherent dynamics that alternate re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For such adaptation, the network naturally forms clusters of strongly connected units (see Figure 3). By contrast, the causality of traditional asymmetric STDP rules will be reflected in the network structure as shown in Figure 5 and highlighted very recently in Thiele et al (2023). To analyze the mean-field dynamics of such networks, a natural approach would be to computationally identify emerging feedforward structures in such networks instead of looking for clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such adaptation, the network naturally forms clusters of strongly connected units (see Figure 3). By contrast, the causality of traditional asymmetric STDP rules will be reflected in the network structure as shown in Figure 5 and highlighted very recently in Thiele et al (2023). To analyze the mean-field dynamics of such networks, a natural approach would be to computationally identify emerging feedforward structures in such networks instead of looking for clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the causality of traditional asymmetric STDP rules will be reflected in the network structure as shown in Fig. 5 and highlighted very recently in (Thiele, Berner, Tass, Schöll, & Yanchuk, 2023). To analyze the mean-field dynamics of such networks, a natural approach would be to computationally identify emerging feed-forward structures in such networks instead of looking for clusters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the phase-locked regime, the dynamics relax instantaneously to equilibrium, which defines the critical manifold of the slow-fast system on which A i takes its value at equilibrium. In the regime where the phase difference ϕ ( t ) is drifting, we replace the instantaneous frequency in A i by the temporal average Ω i ; this is similar to the approach in [15]. Finally, we consider the system at the border between the two regimes.…”
Section: Coupling Heterodimer Dynamics With Oscillatory Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networks exhibiting such mutual interactions between dynamical processes and network topology are referred to as adaptive, or coevolutionary, networks [6, 10, 11]. In a range of applications, including oscillator networks [1215], consensus dynamics [16], and epidemic-resource dynamics [17], coevolutionary dynamics may also operate on disparate timescales. Although techniques from geometric singular perturbation theory [18] and averaging theory [19] can provide insights into the emerging multiple-timescale dynamics, these methods become daunting in high dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%