2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2013.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric behavior of unemployment rates: Evidence from the quantile covariate unit root test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical results of ADF and KPSS test suggest mixed results for the series in levels. These findings are partly consistent to the results of Roed (1996), Chang et al (2007), Lin et al (2008), Gustavsson and Osterholm (2010), Lee et al (2010), Chang and Lee (2011a, b), Chang (2011), Lee et al (2013), andFuruoka (2014), indicating that hysteresis in unemployment holds.…”
Section: Traditional Unit Root Testssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The empirical results of ADF and KPSS test suggest mixed results for the series in levels. These findings are partly consistent to the results of Roed (1996), Chang et al (2007), Lin et al (2008), Gustavsson and Osterholm (2010), Lee et al (2010), Chang and Lee (2011a, b), Chang (2011), Lee et al (2013), andFuruoka (2014), indicating that hysteresis in unemployment holds.…”
Section: Traditional Unit Root Testssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Stationarity or unit root presence in GDP time series is a controversial issue and has long been a puzzle in the literature (see for example Cushman (2016) and references cited therein). Similarly, the existence of unit root in unemployment data is questionable (see (Lee et al, 2013(Lee et al, , 2009 and references cited therein).…”
Section: Testing For Unit Roots and Cointegrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to linear linkages, the variables of interest may have nonlinear linkages. This is due to growing empirical evidence that suggests nonlinearities in unemployment rate time series (see, e.g., Rothman 1991Rothman , 1998Skalin and Terasvirta 2002 ;Caporale and Gil-Alanal 2007 ;Cancelo 2007 ;Lee et al 2013 ). These nonlinearities are normally attributed to asymmetries in adjustment costs ( Bentolilla and Bertola 1990 ), job destruction ( Caballero and Hammour 1994 ), and to capital destruction ( Bean 1989 ).…”
Section: Causality Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%