2015
DOI: 10.1364/ol.40.001865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric dwell-time statistics of polarization chaos from free-running VCSEL

Abstract: We experimentally report on asymmetric dwell-time statistics of polarization chaos dynamics generated from free-running vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VCSELs). Theoretically, we explain this behavior by introducing a misalignment between the phase and amplitude anisotropy within the spin-flip model for VCSELs. It induces an asymmetry in the VCSEL polarization behavior which is then responsible for significant changes in the statistics of the chaotic mode-hopping with an increase in the average reside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters are as follows: κ and γ are the field and carrier decay rates respectively, γ s is the spin flip relaxation rate, α is the linewidth enhancement factor, γ p and γ a are the phase and amplitude anisotropies respectively. For simplicity, no misalignment between amplitude and phase anisotropies is considered [3], [33], [34]. Unless stated otherwise, we use the same parameter values as in previous work [10], [35]: κ = 600 ns −1 , γ s = 100 ns −1 , γ a = −0.7 ns −1 , γ = 1 ns −1 and α = 3.…”
Section: Spin-flip Model and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters are as follows: κ and γ are the field and carrier decay rates respectively, γ s is the spin flip relaxation rate, α is the linewidth enhancement factor, γ p and γ a are the phase and amplitude anisotropies respectively. For simplicity, no misalignment between amplitude and phase anisotropies is considered [3], [33], [34]. Unless stated otherwise, we use the same parameter values as in previous work [10], [35]: κ = 600 ns −1 , γ s = 100 ns −1 , γ a = −0.7 ns −1 , γ = 1 ns −1 and α = 3.…”
Section: Spin-flip Model and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original SFM framework, these two scrolls and two steady-states -along with all the other intermediate states that appears on the route to chaos -are perfectly symmetrical. But this is not completely accurate in practice as asymmetries can easily be observed experimentally 15,16 . Including an anisotropy misalignment therefore breaks the symmetry of the system, which allows to reproduce detailed features of the dynamical scenario and to ensure a higher level of generality.…”
Section: Theoretical Model Sfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α is the linewidth enhancement factor and the injection current is represented by µ. Unless specified otherwise, we use the following parameter values which are similar to those used in previous works [15][16][17] : α = 3, κ = 600 ns −1 , γ = 1 ns −1 , γ s = 100 ns −1 , γ a = −0.7 ns −1 , θ = 0.05 rad. Although the chaotic dynamics appears using these values, it is important to emphasize that chaos is obtained in a large range of parameters and not only in a small region of the parameter space.…”
Section: Theoretical Model Sfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can clearly observe a strong gap between the two set of data as a difference of about 2 orders of magnitude is recorded between the residence times of the two levels. Strong fluctuations are also observed but, again, the trend is clear and suggests an asymmetrical behavior as analyzed in [140]. Finally, in the last plot we show the number of jumps versus injection current, which is the number of jumps in the recorded time-series.…”
Section: Time-series and Random Like-hoppingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In QD-VCSELs, the two EP states have a strong ellipticity and are typically symmetrical with respect to the polarization direction of the laser eigenmodes, as schematically illustrated in Figure 5.20b. Small asymmetries between EP state 1 (EP1) and EP state 2 (EP2) have already been reported, but were deduced either from asymmetries in the residence time statistics [140] or from the appearance of dynamical bistability [137], since no significant asymmetries could be realized between the polarization orientation of the two EP states. Consequently, the largest amplitude for the random-like hopping is always obtained for projection at 45° of the polarization direction at threshold [138].…”
Section: Orientation Of the Polarization Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%