2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric effects of heterogeneous environmental standards on green technology innovation: Evidence from China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the following methods are used to analyze green technology innovation: (1) regression analysis using ordinary least squares [ 73 , 74 , 75 ]; (2) game models, in order to test the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation [ 76 ]; (3) DID models, in order to study the impact of environmental standards on green technology innovation [ 77 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the following methods are used to analyze green technology innovation: (1) regression analysis using ordinary least squares [ 73 , 74 , 75 ]; (2) game models, in order to test the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation [ 76 ]; (3) DID models, in order to study the impact of environmental standards on green technology innovation [ 77 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by Ho et al (2023) and Ren et al (2021b), we constructed a variable, GI = ln(t + 1) , to measure firms' green innovation, where t represents the total number of green patent applications in a given year. The number of patent applications, rather than patents granted, was chosen to measure the level of green innovation because a patent‐granting procedure generally takes 3–5 years to complete, which cannot effectively reflect the green innovation efforts of firms in the current period (Xu et al, 2023). Firms need time to implement innovations; therefore, we used green innovation in year t + 1 , which also alleviated concerns about potential endogeneity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of GF, whether in the form of an institutional framework or a market mechanism, has a substantial impact on the sustainable infrastructure and the cultivation of economic sustainability (Mahmood et al, 2024). Based on the study (Xu & Lin, 2024), GF has the potential to improve signi cantly this connection, resulting in a situation where both the economic and the ecological achieve prosperity. Engaging in green infrastructure planning can give rise to tensions, particularly between the desire for recreational activities and the need to safeguard ecological integrity in green spaces.…”
Section: H5mentioning
confidence: 99%