2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02298781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric effects of inflation shocks on inflation uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By providing an explanation for the asymmetric relationship between inflation and inflation uncertainty, Caporale and Caporale [16] employed a TARCH model on monthly US inflation data for the period 1961:01-2000:03 and conclude that negative inflationary shocks result in greater inflation uncertainty than positive shocks. For the UK, Kontonikas [17] uses inflation data spanning the 1972-2002 period to support Friedman-Ball hypothesis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By providing an explanation for the asymmetric relationship between inflation and inflation uncertainty, Caporale and Caporale [16] employed a TARCH model on monthly US inflation data for the period 1961:01-2000:03 and conclude that negative inflationary shocks result in greater inflation uncertainty than positive shocks. For the UK, Kontonikas [17] uses inflation data spanning the 1972-2002 period to support Friedman-Ball hypothesis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Engle and Ng[27] for details on the three equations and the testing procedures used to determine whether the ARCH process is asymmetric 8. Following Caporale and Caporale[16], the INFDUM dummy controls for the impact of the high political and economic uncertainty on macroeconomic uncertainty witnessed in the Ghanaian economy for most part of the late 1970s and early 1980s. INFDUM = 1 after the pre-ERP period and 0 otherwise.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of single country studies utilizing the ARCH‐GARCH class of models to proxy inflation uncertainty: Engle (1983), Bollerslev (1986), Cosimano and Jensen (1988), Evans (1991), Brunner and Hess (1993), Caporale and McKiernan (1997), Balcombe (1999), Caporale and Caporale (2002) and Hwang (2001) for the USA; Fountas (2001) and Kontonikas (2004) for the UK; Bohara and Sauer (1994) for Germany; Nas and Perry (2000) and Telatar and Telatar (2003) for Turkey; and Thornton (2007b) for Argentina. Multi‐country studies include Baillie et al (1996); Grier and Perry (1998), Berument and Dincer (2005), and Henry et al (2007) for the G7 countries; Fountas et al (2004) for six European Union countries; Conrad and Karanasos (2005) for the USA, UK, and Japan; Daal et al (2005) for twenty‐two developed and less developed countries; Berument and Yuksel (2007) for nine inflation targeting countries; and Thornton (2007a) for twelve emerging market economies[3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%