2014
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2014.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric flux models for particle-size segregation in granular avalanches

Abstract: Debris and pyroclastic flows often have bouldery flow fronts, which act as a natural dam resisting further advance. Counter intuitively, these resistive fronts can lead to enhanced run-out, because they can be shouldered aside to form static levees that self-channelise the flow. At the heart of this behaviour is the inherent process of size segregation, with different sized particles readily separating into distinct vertical layers through a combination of kinetic sieving and squeeze expulsion. The result is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
131
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(71 reference statements)
9
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also showed that the large particle velocity displayed a peak at approximately φ = 0.55, proving that the coarse grains rise quickest as a group. Gajjar & Gray (2014) showed that the normal constituent velocities associated with the segregation equation (1.1) are…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They also showed that the large particle velocity displayed a peak at approximately φ = 0.55, proving that the coarse grains rise quickest as a group. Gajjar & Gray (2014) showed that the normal constituent velocities associated with the segregation equation (1.1) are…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to model the asymmetric behaviour between large and small grains, Gajjar & Gray (2014) introduced a new class of flux functions with the following properties: (i) F(φ) is skewed towards φ = 0, with a maximum occurring at 0 < φ max < 1/2; (ii) F(φ) is normalised to have the same amplitude as the quadratic flux (1.2); and (iii) F(φ) has at most one inflexion point φ inf in the interval (φ max , 1). Although there are other ways of normalising the class of flux functions, e.g.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations