Asymmetric forest transition driven by the interaction of socioeconomic development and environmental heterogeneity in Central America

Abstract

Forest transitions (FT) have been observed in many developed countries and more recently in the developing world. However, our knowledge of FT from tropical regions is mostly derived from case studies from within a particular country, making it difficult to generalize findings across larger regions. Here we overcome these difficulties by conducting a recent (2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) satellite-based analysis of trends in forest cover across Central America, stratified by biomes, which we related to socioeconomic variables associated with human development. Results show a net decrease of woody vegetation resulting from 12,201 km 2 of deforestation of moist forests and 6,825 km 2 of regrowth of conifer and dry forests. The Human Development Index was the socioeconomic variable best associated with forest cover change. The least-developed countries, Nicaragua and Guatemala, experienced both rapid deforestation of moist forests and significant recovery of conifer and dry forests. In contrast, the most developed countries, Panama and Costa Rica, had net woody vegetation gain and a more stable forest cover configuration. These results imply a good agreement with FT predictions of forest change in relation to socioeconomic development, but strong asymmetry in rates and directions of change largely dependent upon the biome where change is occurring. The FT model should be refined by incorporating ecological and socioeconomic heterogeneity, particularly in multicountry and regional studies. These asymmetric patterns of forest change should be evaluated when developing strategies for conserving biodiversity and environmental services.land-use change | land-cover change | tropics |

Quantifying drivers of population dynamics for a migratory bird throughout the annual cycle

“…Second, the Hansen et al [22] dataset does not distinguish between different forest types and therefore forest loss may have been overestimated if some of the loss occurred in forested habitats that are not suitable for wood thrush. On the non-breeding grounds, most recent forest loss is occurring within relatively mature forests [41] so at the regional scale of our analysis, the estimates of forest cover from Hansen et al [22] are likely good proxies for wood thrush non-breeding habitat availability. In contrast, a large portion of forest loss on the breeding grounds, especially within the southeastern United States, is driven by commercial timber operations [23].…”

Governance, agricultural intensification, and land sparing in tropical South America

“…Among the various socioeconomic factors, those that most correlate with agricultural expansion include crop prices and production costs (6), the need to generate foreign exchange earnings to service external debt (21), per capita gross domestic product (GDP) (22) and population (4,5).…”

“…All these factors have been shown to have a significant effect on agricultural expansion (21,22,40). Agricultural intensification is quantified by considering the value of agricultural output (at constant prices) per hectare of agricultural land.…”

Analysis Framework of China’s Grain Production System: A Spatial Resilience Perspective

“…Since the system scale effect is an important part of spatial resilience, it affects the internal structure and function of the system [91]. Therefore, the spatial heterogeneity of the GPS provides a central description and quantification of the disturbance of this system at cross spatio-temporal scales [69], and thus determines the change of spatial resilience.…”