2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2602751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric Information and Imperfect Competition in Lending Markets

Abstract: We measure the consequences of asymmetric information and imperfect competition in the Italian lending market. We show that banks' optimal price response to an increase in adverse selection varies with competition. Exploiting matched data on loans and defaults, we estimate models of demand for credit, loan use, pricing, and firm default. We find evidence of adverse selection and evaluate its importance. While indeed prices rise in competitive markets and decline in concentrated ones, the former effect dominate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
6
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we would like to construct a plausible estimate of their user cost. There is ample empirical evidence, corroborated by the analysis of Section 5, that banks set their rates based on a limited number of observable characteristics (Ja ee and Modigliani 1969;Crawford et al, 2016). Moreover, it is well established that financing of small and medium firms -the lion share in our data -is tied to their local credit markets as proximity between borrowers and lenders facilitates information acquisition (Petersen and Rajan, 2002;Degryse and Ongena 2005).…”
Section: The User Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we would like to construct a plausible estimate of their user cost. There is ample empirical evidence, corroborated by the analysis of Section 5, that banks set their rates based on a limited number of observable characteristics (Ja ee and Modigliani 1969;Crawford et al, 2016). Moreover, it is well established that financing of small and medium firms -the lion share in our data -is tied to their local credit markets as proximity between borrowers and lenders facilitates information acquisition (Petersen and Rajan, 2002;Degryse and Ongena 2005).…”
Section: The User Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…A body of evidence in the consumer lending market has corroborated these predictions (Ausubel 1991;Adams et al 2009;Einav et al 2012;Agarwal et al 2017). Yet besides a few noteworthy exceptions, empirical evidence for firms remains scant, mostly due to the lack of longitudinal micro-level data that provide information on the borrowing costs paid by individual on firms (Hannan and Berger 1991;Petersen and Rajan 1994;Crawford et al 2016). 9 The analysis of the economic e ects of firing costs in Hopenhayn and Rogerson (1993) is one of the earliest studies of misallocation due to regulation.…”
Section: Data and Institutional Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the stock market, information plays an important role and its acquisition cost is gradual. According to Crawford et al (2015) we assume which is visible investors of type , and is firms in stock markets , and term. Investors gain the utility for stock that is dependent on their demands as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also assumed to be are is distributed as a type of extreme value (Crawford et al, 2015;Berry et al, 1995). Crawford et al (2015) assumed random coefficient of the demand's constant term ̅ , with that have normally distributed with and , so that:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, asymmetric information problems are prevalent in offline marketplaces as well. They have been shown to exist in insurance markets, Finkelstein and McGarry (); credit markets, Crawford, Pavanini, and Schivardi (); and financial markets, Ivashina (); among many others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%