1993
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0416_ameaa_2.3.co_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric Maxillary Expansion Appliance (ABHE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AMEX appliance was designed to reinforce the anchorage of the noncrossbite side teeth by including the mandibular posterior teeth with the aid of the stopper part of the appliance. 25 It is known that light and continuous force produces better physiologic adaptation, greater stability, and less relapse potential than do other forces. 36,37 To deliver light physiologic force, 2 helixes were constructed on the crossbite side, and the appliance initially was expanded 8 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The AMEX appliance was designed to reinforce the anchorage of the noncrossbite side teeth by including the mandibular posterior teeth with the aid of the stopper part of the appliance. 25 It is known that light and continuous force produces better physiologic adaptation, greater stability, and less relapse potential than do other forces. 36,37 To deliver light physiologic force, 2 helixes were constructed on the crossbite side, and the appliance initially was expanded 8 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appliance was constructed following the recommendations of Enacar and Ö zgen. 25 Orthodontic bands were adapted to the maxillary first molars. Maxillary and mandibular impressions were taken and poured in orthodontic plaster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…W-arches and quad-helix appliances can be modified by changing the arms' length to include more teeth in the anchorage unit [24]. Fixed lingual arches have proven to require less overall treatment time and cost-effectiveness compared with removable appliances [25]. A modified quad-helix appliance has been designed to produce asymmetrical expansion [26].…”
Section: Alternative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%