2019
DOI: 10.1101/581520
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric sampling in human auditory cortex reveals spectral processing hierarchy

Abstract: 20Speech perception is mediated by both left and right auditory cortices, but with differential sensitivity to 21 specific acoustic information contained in the speech signal. A detailed description of this functional 22 43 distinct two-timescales processing modes. Overall, our results shed light on the neurofunctional 44 architecture of cortical auditory processing. 45 46

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range for both fast and slow modulations is broadly consistent with the asymmetric sampling model developed for speech (Giroud et al, 2020), which has previously been implicated in the neural bases of the memory for noise (Luo et al, 2013). However, there is a large variability in Figure 5C because each square is based on the correlation of only six points with little variation within these points (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The range for both fast and slow modulations is broadly consistent with the asymmetric sampling model developed for speech (Giroud et al, 2020), which has previously been implicated in the neural bases of the memory for noise (Luo et al, 2013). However, there is a large variability in Figure 5C because each square is based on the correlation of only six points with little variation within these points (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In particular, we found that channel capacities associated with acoustic modulation and syllabic rates were at around 15 Hz while the channel capacity associated with the phonemic rate was at around 35 Hz. These values parallel theoretical considerations and neurophysiological observations (Giraud & Poeppel, 2012;Giroud et al, 2020) and provide a behavioral validation that phonemic sampling occurs at such a rate (see also (Marchesotti et al, 2020). While the acoustic modulation and syllabic rates are often reduced to one another, they are dissociable (see also (Schmidt et al, 2021), are associated with different processing bottlenecks, but both unfold at around 5 Hz in natural speech and have a channel capacity of around 15 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Neural activity recorded in the primary auditory cortex can indeed track the acoustic modulation rate even well outside of the intelligibility range (Nourski et al, 2009;Pefkou, Arnal, Fontolan, & Giraud, 2017). This feat is putatively rendered possible by the short temporal integration windows of early auditory areas (Giroud et al, 2020;Lerner et al, 2014;Poeppel, 2003). Conversely, the degraded comprehension of speeded speech is thought to arise from limitations of higher order brain areas in their speech-decoding capacities (Vagharchakian et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) It is consistent with our previous studies (e.g., 14 Fujioka et al, 2012;Chang et al, 2019). ( 2) Some other studies have interpreted activities below 15 Hz as alpha band (e.g., Ahveninen et al, 2017) and above 25 Hz as low-gamma band (e.g., Giroud et al, 2020). Therefore, it is debatable whether to include these frequencies as beta band.…”
Section: Time-frequency Analysessupporting
confidence: 87%