1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(99)70318-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss in a Community‐Based Population

Abstract: Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASNHL) is fairly common, but it can be an indication of retrocochlear pathology. The incidence of acoustic neuroma (AN) has been estimated at 1/100,000; however, the incidence of AN in patients with ASNHL is unknown. The limitation of health care resources challenges otolaryngologists to develop reasonable cost-containment guidelines for the evaluation of patients with ASNHL for the presence of retrocochlear pathology. A 5-year (1990 to 1994) retrospective study of all pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of Between-ear PTT Asymmetry shows some agreement with the frequency of the L≠R classification; however, they may capture different aspects of Between-ear Asymmetric hearing loss. The common clinical definition of asymmetric hearing loss is that at least one frequency has PTT that differ between the ears by 15 dB or more (Urben et al, 1999). This is a rather liberal definition, and we note that when using the criteria of Demeester et al (2009) instead, the prevalence of asymmetry in our data is similar to theirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of Between-ear PTT Asymmetry shows some agreement with the frequency of the L≠R classification; however, they may capture different aspects of Between-ear Asymmetric hearing loss. The common clinical definition of asymmetric hearing loss is that at least one frequency has PTT that differ between the ears by 15 dB or more (Urben et al, 1999). This is a rather liberal definition, and we note that when using the criteria of Demeester et al (2009) instead, the prevalence of asymmetry in our data is similar to theirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CPA tumors need to be ruled in adults presenting with asymmetric SNHL, this is not common; nor is the case in pediatric asymmetric hearing loss, in which cochlear nerve aplasia, congenital CMV and cochleovestibular anomalies predominate as the etiology in this type of hearing loss. Therefore, the incidence of CPA tumors in patients with ASNHL varies widely from 2.1% to 7.7%, depending on the definition of ASNHL [22,23]. In this study, to take into account all of the different definitions used in previous studies [17,[22][23][24][25], ASNHL was defined as a 15 dB difference at any single frequency or a 15% difference in SDS between ears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the incidence of CPA tumors in patients with ASNHL varies widely from 2.1% to 7.7%, depending on the definition of ASNHL [22,23]. In this study, to take into account all of the different definitions used in previous studies [17,[22][23][24][25], ASNHL was defined as a 15 dB difference at any single frequency or a 15% difference in SDS between ears. As our current study was retrospective, the smaller asymmetries for defining ASNHL do not imply less strict criteria for undergoing MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 2% and 8% of people with ASNHL are found to have an enhancing retrocochlear lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (4,5). Therefore, between 92% and 98% of MRI scans in those patients with hearing loss are negative for tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%