2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(02)02020-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric syntheses of α-mercapto carboxylic acid derivatives by dynamic resolution of N-methyl pseudoephedrine α-bromo esters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another product at m/z 1048 was identified as brostallicin-GSH adduct 7 in which bromine is replaced by one phosphate group ( Figure 2C,D,F). GSH-brostallicin R-bromoamido derivative 4 was not detected under these conditions, confirming the hypothesis that brostallicin, after the addition of GSH, forms a highly reactive intermediate which substitutes bromine with other species present in solution (22)(23)(24). However, a long-lived transient species has been observed at m/z 986.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Another product at m/z 1048 was identified as brostallicin-GSH adduct 7 in which bromine is replaced by one phosphate group ( Figure 2C,D,F). GSH-brostallicin R-bromoamido derivative 4 was not detected under these conditions, confirming the hypothesis that brostallicin, after the addition of GSH, forms a highly reactive intermediate which substitutes bromine with other species present in solution (22)(23)(24). However, a long-lived transient species has been observed at m/z 986.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Enzymatic and non‐enzymatic dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) also represents an efficient approach to access enantioenriched α‐thiocarboxylic acids from esters, due to the ability of a C−S stereocentre in alpha to an electron withdrawing group to racemise under specific conditions. Examples of DKR of thioesters using hydrolase enzymes or thiocarboxylic acids using Nocardia diaphanozonaria cells have been reported by Drueckhammer and Otha, respectively, while Birman described a non‐enzymatic DKR of α‐thiocarboxylic acids using homo‐benzotetramisole ( S )‐HBTM . However, despite the excellent conversion and selectivity, all these methods show some limitations in terms of green chemistry, such as the need of additives and bases ( i Pr 2 NEt or trioctylamine) to promote the dynamic racemization of the substrates, the use of ester protecting groups with consequent production of waste in the chemical process and the need of oxygen‐free conditions to avoid the formation of side products.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are another noticeable synthetic studies leading to chiral 2‐sulfanylpropanoic acid (unless otherwise noted), which are listed in chronologic order: (i) solid‐phase Mitsunobu inversion followed by NH 4 OH hydrolysis, (ii) S N 2 displacement of 2‐bromosuccinic acids derived from chiral aspartic acids specifically leading to 2‐sulfanylsuccinic acid, (iii) esterase‐catalyzed hydrolysis of 2‐( S ‐acetylsulfanyl)propanoate, (iv) S N 2 displacement using tritylthiol followed by reductive deprotection, (v) dynamic resolution method using N ‐methyl pseudoephedrine 2‐bromoesters leading to 2‐sulfanylpropane amide, (vi) Cu‐chiral spiro(bisoxazoline) complex‐catalyzed enantioselective carbenoid insertion into S–H bonds, and (vii) Rh 2 complexes and chiral spiro phosphoric acid‐catalyzed enantioselective S–H bond insertion …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%