2022
DOI: 10.1214/21-aoas1568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric tail dependence modeling, with application to cryptocurrency market data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mostly, authors used smooth transitions in other models, like smooth transition Generalized Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroskedastic (GARCH) models, to study asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrency markets [ 34 ]. Gong and Huser [ 35 ] applied asymmetric tail dependence models to test cryptocurrency market data. They also proposed a parsimonious copula model that keeps high flexibility in both the lower and upper tails of the cryptocurrency market.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly, authors used smooth transitions in other models, like smooth transition Generalized Autoregressive Conditionally Heteroskedastic (GARCH) models, to study asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrency markets [ 34 ]. Gong and Huser [ 35 ] applied asymmetric tail dependence models to test cryptocurrency market data. They also proposed a parsimonious copula model that keeps high flexibility in both the lower and upper tails of the cryptocurrency market.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian copula is the simplest of these models and has a restrictive dependence structure, i.e., its bivariate distribution can only be asymptotically independent or perfectly dependent, and its tail dependence structure is regulated by a single parameter: the correlation coefficient. Inverted max-stable models present the same difficulties for inference as max-stable models since often only likelihoods based on lower-dimensional densities are available (Padoan et al, 2010;Castruccio et al, 2016); the Huser-Wadsworth model, as well as its extension to model dependence jointly in the lower and upper tails (Gong and Huser, 2021), can capture both asymptotic dependence and independence but its distribution and (potentially censored) density functions rely on unidimensional integrals which have to be computed numerically, and this is computationally prohibitive in high dimensions, especially when computation of the multivariate normal distribution function is required; the conditional extremes model allows the change of asymptotic dependence class with distance between sites but it lacks a simple unconditional interpretation; see Huser and Wadsworth (2020) for a more detailed discussion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture complex extremal dependence structure in multivariate spatial extremes, we propose in this paper a novel multi-factor copula model for multivariate spatial data that can capture all possible distinct combinations of extremal dependence types within each individual spatial process while allowing for flexible cross-process extremal dependence structures, for both the upper and lower tails. Our new model builds upon Huser and Wadsworth (2019), who proposed a spatial extremes model for the upper tail of a single variable, and it extends the bivariate copula model of Gong and Huser (2022), used to estimate time-varying tail dependencies in bivariate financial time series, to the multivariate spatial extremes setting. Rewriting our proposed model as a Bayesian hierarchical model with multiple latent variables, we here perform Bayesian inference using a customized Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm based on carefully designed block proposals with an adaptive step size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%